World s Population and Food Supply

0
0
1981 days ago, 742 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
I. World Population Increases. A. Right now 6 billion individuals in the worldB. 8000 BC 5 million individuals in the world1. It took 9500 years for the populace to get to 500 million (from 8000 BC to 1500 AD to increase by 10)2. Somewhere around 1600 and 1856 world populace multiplied (1 billion in 200 years)3. From 1856

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Total populace and Food Supply AGST 3000 Agriculture, Society and the Natural World

Slide 2

I. Total populace Increases A. Right now 6 billion individuals on the planet B. 8000 BC 5 million individuals on the planet 1. It took 9500 years for the populace to get to 500 million (from 8000 BC to 1500 AD to increase by 10) 2. In the vicinity of 1600 and 1856 total populace multiplied (1 billion in 200 years) 3. From 1856 – 1930 populace multiplied again (2 billion in 80 years) 4. From 1930 – 1975 populace multiplied again (4 billion in 45 years)

Slide 3

Today  • The total populace outperformed six billion in October, 1999 (6.2 today), and develops by almost 80 million every year (roughly the number of inhabitants in Germany). • Ninety-seven percent of all populace development is happening in the poorest parts of the world. • By 2015, 23 urban communities will have more than 10 million tenants; 19 of them will be in creating nations.

Slide 5

II. World Food Needs A. Population and wage are the central point in deciding sustenance utilization 1. World nourishment request is developing at a rate of 2% every year – 1.8% of this due to populace increment and .2% as a result of rising earnings

Slide 6

Imbalanced utilization versus populace 20% of the worldwide populace expends 70% of its material assets and has 80% of the riches. Source: World Wildlife Fund The larger part of this 20% in focused in Canada, USA, Saudi Arabia, Australia, and Japan. Source: World Wildlife Fund

Slide 7

2. Distinction in particular nations a. Poorest nations (Africa, Asia, and Latin America) 2.5% expansion sought after, yet just a 1.9% increment in supply. b. These nations normally rely on upon US, Canadian and Australian grain supplies. c. The US produces: 32% of all global exchange wheat, 68% of every single coarse grain (corn and sorghum), and 17% of all rice

Slide 8

3. Nourishment creation is not the issue – is sustenance dissemination the issue? a. insufficient framework – streets, correspondence, fuel b. absence of access to logical information (research and augmentation benefit non-existent) c. government impedance in market strengths – wars, political turmoil, changing government structure, defilement. - recollect Afghanistan, Zimbabwe, Haiti d. But late review proposes that appropriation of nourishment won't not be the issue… rather an unequal circulation of riches… why do you think this may be valid?

Slide 9

Food issues far and wide In 75 countries, per capita sustenance creation has declined in the course of recent years. (UN Development Program, Human Development Report 1998.) Why? Among the bigger nations where contracting cropland per individual debilitates future sustenance security are Nigeria, Ethiopia, and Pakistan, all nations with feeble family arranging programs. For instance, as Nigeria's populace goes from 111 million today to an anticipated 244 million in 2050, its grainland per individual will recoil from 0.15 hectares to 0.07 hectares.

Slide 10

Food issues far and wide proceeded with… Pakistan's anticipated development from 146 million today to 345 million by 2050 will contract its grainland per individual from 0.08 hectares at present to 0.03 hectares, a range hardly the measure of a tennis court. Nations where grainland per individual has contracted to 0.03 hectares, for example, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, each import somewhere in the range of 70 percent of their grain. More than seventy five percent of a billion people experience the ill effects of lack of healthy sustenance.

Slide 11

Food issues far and wide proceeded… Between 1945 and 1990 sustenance generation and other human exercises debased about three billion sections of land of vegetated land, a zone equivalent to China and India joined. 66% of the most corrupted land is in Africa and Asia. Source: World Watch Institute, March 1999

Slide 12

Increasing the World's Food Supply..How? A. Crop Yields 1. Great divergence between nations a. Wheat Production: Pakistan = 2.1 metric tons for each hectare Germany = 6.9 metric tons for every hectare b. Corn Production: India = 1.6 metric tons for every hectare U.S. = 7.1 metric tons for every hectare c. How could creation in these nations be increased?

Slide 13

1. "Green Revolution" 1970's The presentation of high yielding assortments of wheat and rice in Asia multiplied or tripled yields… however with ecological and social results Increasing the World's Food Supply..How?

Slide 14

2. Hereditary Manipulation: GMO's (Genetically Modified Organisms) Increased yields Decrease the requirement for pesticides c. Neutracueticals d. "Frankenfoods" e. Environmental outcomes f. Websites http://students.washington.edu/ebv7777/gmo.html http://www.effectiveoptions.com/GMO/biotechnology.htm http://ohioline.osu.edu/gmo/articles.html Increasing the World's Food Supply..How?

Slide 15

3. Arrive Area 1. Land surface = 25% of the earth, the rest is water, polar icecaps 2. Africa and South America have the biggest regions of possibly arable land. a. Africa at present homesteads 20% of its conceivably arable land. b. South America ranches 10% Increasing the World's Food Supply..How?

Slide 16

Land Area … proceeded with 3. The U.S., Canada, Australia and New Zealand have around 1 billion more sections of land that could be cultivated. a. Land might be cultivated on the off chance that it gets to be distinctly practical to do as such b. Water accessibility assumes a substantial part in deciding homestead land's gainful limit c. Ecosystem debasement and natural concerns 4. World populace expanded by 30% from 1975 – 1990, however arrive territory used to bolster that populace expanded just 3.6%

Slide 17

4. Food from the Sea 1. Aquatic items are a vital nourishment source in Japan, Norway, Spain, Iceland, Portugal and Southeast Asia 2. However, angle make up just 1% of the world's caloric admission and just 6% of all protein 3. Long-term gets ready for "Cultivating the Sea" will do little to settle world craving problems Increasing the World's Food Supply..How?

Slide 18

History… .Malthusian quandary 1. Reverend Thomas R. Malthus, writing in 1798 picked up popularity for what he called the "rule of populace" a. His idea was that nourishment supplies could just increment numerically however populaces would increment geometrically b. Economic guideline in light of the "Theory of unavoidable losses" – expanding work to a settled measure of land

Slide 19

Malthusian predicament … proceeded with c. 200 years after the fact – both populace and sustenance supplies have expanded geometrically – Why? Expanding land territory for nourishment creation – after his forecast (1798)… North America's potential for sustenance generation was not known 1920's expansion in automation 1960's use of logical standards to horticulture (plant reproducing, water system, plant security)

Slide 20

Looking into the Future A. As monetary development happens, populaces move from agrarian (high ripeness, vast families, high mortality) to modern (the world's wealthiest nations have stable or contracting populaces) 1. Fact – World birth rates are diminishing yet the populace is expanding in light of the fact that individuals are living longer B. Crucial address "By what method will sustenance issues be managed later on?" Political use, Economic Control? C. Developing uncultivated land i.e. Rainforests, tends to prompt to natural corruption and loss of species changeability D. Raising product and animals yields - innovation

Slide 21

In Class Writing Assignment What elements would bolster the idea that man is destined on planet earth? What components may change or what changes may happen that would evade the above question? What ought to the general population of created countries do to help stem starvation in immature zones of the world? Why is just giving innovation to immature ranges of the world not the correct answer? Where do you see the best potential in settling the issue of sustenance deficiencies with a developing populace on earth?

SPONSORS