Word Processing and Page Layout

2657 days ago, 775 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Word Processing and Page Layout Choices for various needs

Slide 2

Choices Microsoft Word Corel WordPerfect Adobe FrameMaker Adobe PageMaker/InDesign/Quark LaTex

Slide 3

Microsoft Word Standard – everybody has it Not much preparing required for basic undertakings Fairly capable . . . On the off chance that you know the traps Crashes, bugs, strangeness of Microsoft Not cross-stage perfect Equations bulky to distribute and alter Not intended for books or other long activities Page format highlights constrained

Slide 4

Corel WordPerfect It's not from Microsoft Easy to utilize Not as standard as Word Poor page format Poor cross-stage similarity

Slide 5

Adobe FrameMaker Designed for books and long productions Tools for ordering, reference indices, and so forth. Amazing cross-stage execution Ready to multipurpose records Stable Equations effortlessly altered, distributed Excellent import/send out abilities

Slide 6

PageMaker/InDesign/Quark Designed for page format Works well with others Excellent typographical control Require some preparation to be compelling No local condition altering Best for picture escalated designs Best decision for pre-press

Slide 7

PageMaker versus InDesign versus Quark Express PageMaker Easy to utilize, however getting to be obsolete InDesign Powerful It's from Adobe, works with Photoshop, and so forth. Cutting edge apparatuses Quark Express Outpaced by InDesign It's not from Adobe

Slide 8

LaTex et al Powerful typographical control Standard for a few distributions Cross stage good Outstanding condition altering Cumbersome, requires broad preparing Open source, so support can be elusive or inaccessible

Slide 9

Summary Choose the right instrument for the right employment Analyze needs Consider time invested composing versus energy spent fiddling Consider distributer's needs Consider content creation It's best to utilize a few bundles

Slide 10