Water Quality

1728 days ago, 601 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Clean Water Act. In 1972 congress embraced the Clean Water Act, to restore and keep up the synthetic, physical and natural honesty of the nation\'s waters.. Water Quality. Permits States,Tribes and Jurisdictions to set their own particular water quality guidelines, however requires that they met and incorporate the

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

´╗┐Water Quality Intro by Erick Bjorkland Chesapeake Bay Case Study Brandon Powers Created Wetlands via Carol Ann Dulin Saltwater Case Study by Meghan Barron

Slide 2

Clean Water Act In 1972 congress embraced the Clean Water Act, to reestablish and keep up the synthetic, physical and organic respectability of the country's waters.

Slide 3

Water Quality Allows States,Tribes and Jurisdictions to set their own water quality gauges, yet requires that they met and incorporate the "fishable and swimmable" objectives of the demonstration.

Slide 4

Water Quality Provides for the assurance and spread of fish, shellfish and natural life. It accommodates entertainment in and on the water. These are the "fishable and swimmable" objectives of the Clean Water Act.

Slide 5

Water Quality Water quality has three components. Outlined utilizations Criteria created to secure each utilization Antidegradation policy

Slide 6

Designated Uses

Slide 7

Water Quality Criteria Numerical - build up edges for the physical, synthetic and natural credits required to bolster an advantageous utilize. Story - depict, as opposed to measure, conditions that must be kept up to bolster an assigned utilize.

Slide 8

Antidegradation arrangements Narrative explanations planned to shield existing utilizations and keep waterbodies from breaking down regardless of the possibility that their water quality is superior to the fishable and swimmable objectives of the Act.

Slide 9

Summary of Use Support for U.S. Waters States announced that 49% of their surveyed estuarine waters have great water quality that completely underpins assigned employments. The staying 51% has some type of contamination or natural surroundings debasement.

Slide 10

States Reported That Pollutants: Impact amphibian life in 11,391 square miles (around 52%) of estuarine waters. Limit angle utilization in 6,255 square miles ( around 48%) of estuarine waters. Limit shellfish reaping in 5,288 square miles ( around 25%) of estuarine waters. Abuse swimming criteria in 3,245 square miles ( around 15%) of estuarine waters.

Slide 11

Pollutants originate from point and nonpoint sources (NPS). NPS incorporate stormwater, diffuse horticultural overflow from fields and line crops, concentrated farming squanders from feedlots, spillover from building destinations, ranger service exercises, waste from mining exercises. NPS contribute > 65% of the aggregate contamination load to U.S. inland surface waters (Olson).

Slide 12

Pollutants Most frequently there is more than one toxin affecting a solitary estuarine waterbody. There are all the more square miles of estuarine waters dirtied by metals than some other poison or stressor. Mercury is the essential metal toxin. The biggest number of hindered streams and waterways is in the Appalachian district. This is brought on by the filtering of substantial metals.

Slide 13

Pollutants in Estuaries Pesticides dirty 5,985 square miles. Oxygen exhaustion from natural squanders affect 5,324 square miles. Pathogens impair4,764 square miles.

Slide 14

Pesticide contamination The best potential for pesticide pollution is on the eastern seaboard. Spillover is the real method of transportation however 10-30% originate from airborne float. As yet getting DDT from S. America by means of this mode. Pesticides are notwithstanding being identified in groundwater (atrazine, aldicarb and alachor)

Slide 15

Nitrogen and Phosphorous Large measures of N and P can bring about to much vegetation development and rot, prompting to water science changes and restricted vegetation differing qualities. Contingent upon the wetland, either can go about as a constraining operator for algal development.

Slide 16

State Reported Sources Municipal point sources (sewage treatment plants) are the most far reaching polluters (5,779 square miles). Urban overflow impacts 5,045 square miles. Mechanical release dirty 4,116 square miles. Climatic statement impacts 3,692 square miles.

Slide 17

Polluters and Sources

Slide 18

Benefits and Drawbacks The Congaree Bottomland Hardwood Swamp expels the measure of toxins yearly that a 5 million $ treatment plant would. Around 43% of the governmentally undermined and jeopardized species depend on these wetland. >400 treatment plants release to common wetlands in the Southeast alone. A few wetlands get all or most water contributions from sewage release.

Slide 19

State of the Nation Only 8% of the Nations add up to wetlands are reviewed.

Slide 20

Water Quality in the Chesapeake Bay

Slide 21

Chesapeake Bay Largest estuary in North America Drains bits of six states Virginia Maryland Delaware Pennsylvania New York West Virginia The District of Columbia

Slide 22

Chesapeake Bay Watershed

Slide 23

Top 4 Stressers on the Bay's Systems Toxic Chemicals Air Pollution Excess Nutrients Human Influence

Slide 24

Main Cause of Chesapeake Bay's Poor Water Quality Excess Nutrients

Slide 25

Case Study Benefits of water quality direction in the Chesapeake Bay area from 1972-Present Findings in light of model changes in encompassing water quality Focuses on Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P)

Slide 26

Effects of Excess Nutrients Elevated levels of Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) make algal blossoms Depletes Oxygen (O) Blocks Sunlight Linked to episodes of pfiesteria (a poison bringing about injuries on fish)

Slide 27

More Effects from Excess Nutrients Fish Kills Water unfit for recreational activities(boating, angling, swimming) Harmful to shellfish rendering them unfit for human utilization Can bring about human respiratory issues shape poisons discharged into the air

Slide 28

Chesapeake Bay Program Spurred by the Clean Water Act (CWA) The First Chesapeake Bay Agreement was marked in 1983 Maryland Virginia Pennsylavania District of Columbia Chesapeake Bay Commission ( a tri-state administrative body) U. S. Ecological Protection Agency

Slide 29

Chesapeake Bay Agreement 1983 Set up Chesapeake Bay Council Implemented Water Quality Monitoring Program Directly measured 19 water quality parameters 49 stations in tributaries and mainstem narrows 2 times each month

Slide 30

Chesapeake Bay Agreement 1987 Set an objective to decrease the supplements Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) entering the Bay by 40% by the year 2000

Slide 31

Chesapeake Bay Agreement 1987 Identified fundamental wellsprings of supplements Farmland Urban Landscape Wastewater Treatment Plants Introduced Nutrient Reduction Practices

Slide 32

Nutrient Reduction Practices Nutrient and creature squander administration on horticulture arrive Conservation culturing Vegetated cradle strips at the edge of fields Stream bank fencing Ditching Nutrient Management Planning

Slide 33

Nutrient Reduction Practices Phosphate Detergent Bans Wastewater Treatment Plants Urban Best Management Practices Erosion and Sediment Controls Stormwater Management Septic System Management

Slide 34

Nutrient Reduction Practices Point Source Controls Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR)

Slide 35

In 1992 the Chesapeake Bay Program Partners consented to proceed with the 40% lessening objective past 2000 and started to assault supplements at their source Upstream and the Bay's tributaries Use long haul checking Computer demonstrating

Slide 36

Chesapeake Bay Agreement 2000 Bay Program Partners consent to work with the headwater states Delaware New York West Virginia

Slide 37

Chesapeake Bay Agreement 2000 Continue to enhance past Nitrogen (N) and Phosphorus (P) objectives Implemented new water quality gauges Use Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)

Slide 38

Results Between 1985 and 1997 Annual Phosphorus (P) loads diminished by 8 million lbs Annual Nitrogen (N) loads lessened by 32 million lbs

Slide 39

Results Point Source Reduction in the vicinity of 1985 and 1997 Annual Phosphorus (P) loads lessened by 16 million lbs Annual Nitrogen (N) loads lessened by 5 million lbs

Slide 40

Results Non-Point Source Reduction in the vicinity of 1985 and 1997 Annual Phosphorus (P) loads lessened by 16 million lbs Annual Nitrogen (N) loads decreased by 1 million lbs

Slide 41

Estimated Benefits Total Benefits incorporate Recreation (angling, drifting, swimming) Commercial (angling) Health Non-utilize values Property estimations Regional monetary qualities

Slide 42

Estimated Benefits People in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed have gotten benefits that range from $360 million to $1.8 billion in absolute advantages Beach clients benefits go from $290 million to $1.5 billion Trailered sailing benefits go from $7 million to $84 million

Slide 43

Why wetlands for wastewater medications? Water immersed conditions prompt to diminished gas trade Less gas trade adds to higher anaerobic movement, permitting plentiful microbial development Combined, these ascribes permit wetlands to change natural materials into supplements.

Slide 44

Improving Water Quality Settling of particulate matter Filtration and synthetic precipitation through contact of water with substrate Breakdown and change poisons by microorganisms

Slide 45

Wetland Systems Free Water Surface Systems Basins or channels Natural or developed boundary to avoid drainage Shallow water profundity, low stream consistency, and nearness of the plant stalks to manage water stream

Slide 46

Subsurface Flow Systems Trench or bed with impermeable layer Built with slight slant amongst gulf and outlet Waste water streams on a level plane through rhizosphere of wetland plants Wastewater then treated by filtration, sorption, and precipitation forms in the dirt and by microbial debasement The profluent is then gathered at the outlet channel and released

Slide 48

Things to remember when outlining a wetland for waste water treatment Hydrology-generally vital!! Atmosphere and climate High streams by rain and expanded snow soften abbreviate the home time of poisons and productivity of treatment abatements Heavy rain after time of dryness has most noteworthy effect on treatment effectiveness Freezing temps can