The Works Progress Organization (1935-1943): Social Security Net, Focal Arranging or Political Realism?

0
0
2017 days ago, 696 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Photograph of Philip Guston, Maintaining America

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

The Works Progress Administration (1935-1943): Social Safety Net, Central Planning or Political Pragmatism? Cameron M. Weber PhD understudy in financial aspects and chronicled concentrates New School for Social Research

Slide 2

Photo of Philip Guston, Maintaining America's Skills, WPA Building, New York World's Fair 1939, from Francis V. O'Connor, The Deal New Deal Art Projects: An Anthology of Memoirs (1972).

Slide 3

The Works Progress Administration (1935-1943): Social Safety Net, Central Planning or Political Pragmatism? "We might duty and assess, spend and spend, and choose and choose." – Harry Hopkins, Administrator of the Works Progress Administration, in 1938

Slide 4

The Works Progress Administration (1935-1943): Social Safety Net, Central Planning or Political Pragmatism? Research is blend of History of Economics, History of Public Policy, Political History, Political Economy and Historiography. Inspiration for Research is to comprehend improvement of welfare state in American culture.

Slide 5

Research Methodology : "a cognizant way to deal with a subject of research by method for hypothetical inquiries and methodological standards," Georg J. Iggers, Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge (1997). Endeavored to discover all diary articles and monographs in the course of the most recent 20 years which say both the New Deal and the WPA with a specific end goal to answer look into question, Was the WPA a social security net, focal arranging or would it say it was political sober mindedness? The WPA (1935-1943)

Slide 6

What was the WPA ? US Government went about as long haul "qualified" boss of final resort (first and last time this has happened). Biggest peacetime program in American history until that time (starting allocation in 1935 right around 7% of GDP). Right around 25% of all American families got pay from the WPA amid its life-of-program.

Slide 7

What was the WPA ? Worked in every one of the 48 states. Assembled approx. 480 airplane terminals, 78,000 scaffolds 40,000 open structures, 67,000 miles of city avenues, 24,000 miles of walkways, 24,000 miles of sewer lines, 19,700 miles of water mains, 500 water treatment offices and 572,000 miles of provincial thruways. Utilized approx. 5,000 craftsmen, with workmanship focuses in all states, made 2 million master WPA lithographs and made ceaseless arrangement of WPA craftsmanship shows.

Slide 9

Results of Research on WPA Long historiography on New Deal however WPA itself has just been protest of investigation for around the most recent 10 years. WPA has been "understudied", Amenta and Halfmann, "Who Voted with Hopkins? Institutional Politics and the WPA", The Journal of Policy History 13 (2001). History specialists have "missed" changing needs of American state by neglecting expansive spending on open works amid the New Deal, Jason Scott Smith, "The New Deal Order," Enterprise and Society 9 (2008) and Smith, Building New Deal Liberalism: The Political Economy of Public Works, 1933-1956 (2006).

Slide 10

Results of Research on WPA Skocpal , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (1992) and Plotke , Building a Democratic Political Order: Reshaping American Liberalism in the 1940s (1996) contain no list reference to WPA. Kennedy, Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945 (1999); Powell, FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression (2003); Shlaes, The Forgotten Man: A New History of the Great Depression (2007) and Cohen, FDR's Inner Circle and the Hundred Days that Created Modern America (2009) all do contain WPA list things.

Slide 11

WPA as Central Planning ? Historiographical agreement (for instance Kennedy 1999 and Goldberg 2005*) demonstrate that there were two New Deals. "In the first place" New Deal ("the initial 100 days" in 1933) was endeavor at monetary recuperation with the Agricultural Adjustment Act, the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Truth in Securities Act (foundation of SEC). "Second" New Deal (1935-1936) was social change and the National Labor Relations Board, the Social Security Act, the FDIC, the FHA and the WPA. WPA was a piece of social change plan not financial recuperation motivation. * Chad Alan Goldberg, "Challenging the Status of Relief Workers amid the New Deal: The Workers Alliance of America and the Works Progress Administration, 1935-1941", Social Science History 29 (2005).

Slide 12

WPA as Central Planning ? Moreover, Roosevelt (1932, unemployment approx. 23%), "I view decrease in Federal spending as a standout amongst the most critical issues in this crusade." Roosevelt (1935, unemployment approx. 20%), "obviously we will give helpful work to the poor unemployed." Roosevelt's open announcements demonstrate that WPA expected as wellbeing net, not focal arranging.

Slide 13

New Deal as Social Reform Until 1980s researchers were ordering New Deal historiographies as "traditionalist" or "revisionist". Traditionalists trust Roosevelt and New Dealers controlled motivation and permitted just barely enough social change to spare private enterprise. This is "Institutionalist hypothesis of history" where the state has office. Revisionists trust state power is tempered by need to earn votes and in this manner the New Deal pushed its social change beyond what many would consider possible on American masses. This is "political hypothesis of history". * See Wallis, "Business, Politics and Economic Recovery amid the Great Depression," The Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (1987), for an overview on revisionist and traditionalist New Deal writing.

Slide 14

WPA as Social Safety Net? In the 1990s another New Deal historiography created which combined the traditionalist and revisionist methodologies and which utilizes the to this point "understudied" WPA as the protest of examination. Flanagan, "Roosevelt, Mayors and the New Deal Regime: The Origins of Intergovernmental Lobbying and Administration," Polity 31 (1999) finds that WPA financing was higher in urban communities which upheld Roosevelt in the Presidential decisions. Amenta and Poulsen, "Social Politics in Context: The Institutional Politics Theory and Social Spending toward the End of the New Deal," Social Forces 75 (1996) utilizes Institutional-Political model to demonstrate that WPA assets were spent at a higher per capita level in urban areas and states which upheld the New Deal objective of master work enactment. In this way the WPA can't be viewed as a social security net where WPA assets are given to those hardest hit by unemployment but instead a program where assets are given for political purposes.

Slide 15

WPA as Political Pragmatism Goldberg 2005 finds that the WPA was "cross breed" between a social spending program and a work program, adjusting guild requires an overarching wage (commanded by Congress in 1939) and the Administration's desire to forestall organizing "alleviation" over "recuperation" (Kennedy 1999). "The Roosevelt Administration composed the WPA as a trade off foundation to some extent to deal with these contentions" (Goldberg 2005). Furthermore, along these lines at last, the WPA as executed was political practicality adjusting contending political interests while facilitating the Administration's star work motivation and utilizing WPA assets to compensate constituent support.

Slide 16

WPA as Political Pragmatism Graph from Weber, "How Flexible was the Works Progress Administration in Responding to Unemployment amid the Great Depression?" (2009), Draft accessible from cameroneconomics.com.

Slide 17

WPA as Cultural Change Agent ? Writing survey finds that insufficient has been composed on the WPA to decide a historiographical accord. In any case, Smith 2008 finds that the monstrous and inescapable elected open works all through the 48 states made a social move for a bigger central government nearness in the American individuals' lives. Flanagan 1999 finds that the WPA spoke to a noteworthy move in American federalism as the WPA was utilized to diminish monetary weights of American urban areas for open works extends, and, speaks to "the beginning of intergovernmental campaigning and organization." Harris, F ederal Art and National Culture: The Politics of Identity in New Deal America ( 1995), states that the WPA workmanship ventures made 'social populism'.

Slide 18

WPA as Cultural Change Agent ? Amid 1921 – 1928 state and neighborhood governments represented approx. 90% of US open works spending and the central government for approx. 10 %, from Barber, From New Era to New Deal: Herbert Hoover, the Economists, and American Economic Policy, 1921-1933 (1985). Amid 1931 – 1938, open works spending arrived at the midpoint of approx. half government and half state and neighborhood, from Hansen, Fiscal Policy and Business Cycles (1941).

Slide 19

WPA as Cultural Change Agent ? "By utilizing the focal point of political economy to concentrate on the New Deal's open works spending, we can start to see the frameworks of an alternate elucidation. The tremendous measures of assets gave to open development, the expansive government endeavors put resources into coordinating this cash, and the long-run effect of foundation itself frame the segments of the narrative of an open works transformation. This unrest supported the new part of the government in American life, legitimizing – mentally and physically – what has come to be known as Keynesian administration of the economy" (Smith 2008).

Slide 20

The Works Progress Administration (1935-1943): Social Safety Net, Central Planning or Political Pragmatism? The Pump Priming Act of 1938 was passed by a Congress contrary to the New Deal. "With such a large number of Federal dollars streaming into each Congressional region, the principal Keynesian-style appointments consumption passed for all intents and purposes without Congressional restriction" (Flanagan 1999).

Slide 21

The Works Progr

SPONSORS