The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review Groesz, Levin

Presentation Transcript

The Effect of Experimental Presentation of Thin Media Images on Body Satisfaction: A Meta-Analytic Review Groesz, Levine, & Murnen, 2002 Critique by Tovah Yanover November 7, 2005

Research Domain Body disappointment is a hazard consider for dietary issues and also one of their cardinal elements. It has turned out to be so predominant among females that it has been alluded to by some as "regularizing." One supporter is the disguise of an unattainable thin perfect. The visual media, have assumed a great part of the fault for setting up and proclaiming this perfect. In their meta-examination, Groesz, Levine, and Murnen look at the impact of displaying slender media pictures on body disappointment. The essential question of enthusiasm for this meta-investigation is whether the introduction of thin media pictures will affect the body disappointment of females.

Locating Studies Searched PsycINFO, Medline, and First Search with watchwords media, self-perception, body disappointment, differentiate impact, and thin perfect For distributed and unpublished reviews? Dietary issues, The Journal of Treatment and Prevention, International Journal of Eating Disorders, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, and Sex Roles from 1991 to 1999 Book sections, article and thesis? reference segments

Hypotheses A general noteworthy impact with the end goal that survey slim models would build body disappointment in females. Females with a background marked by dietary issues or high body disappointment would be more vulnerable to the negative impacts of review thin models. Females more youthful than 19 would be more defenseless to the negative impacts of review slim models than females over then 19. A bigger dosage of presentation to the pictures will have more noteworthy negative impacts than a littler measurements.

Measures 4 sorts: body fulfillment, weight fulfillment, physical appeal, and body estimate estimation Unitary ward variable? Subjective and target estimation consolidated Examined as a mediator however ought to have done separate investigations Based conclusions on general test

Moderators Only gave theories for 3 Participant age, history of disappointment or ED, measurement of introduction Also took a gander at sort of outline (between versus inside), kind of result measure, sort of control jolts

Calculation of Effect Sizes Calculated g Experimental gathering mean – control amass mean/pooled SD Applied redress? to unbias gauges

Results Hypothesis 1 bolstered Gave criticalness test, z-esteem, certainty interim No fluctuation gauges introduced Looked for arbitrators in spite of nonsignificant Q-test Claimed direct inconstancy left however no gauge exhibited Presented just d-values; no CI, no changeability

Discussion Too solid Claims in light of omnibus mean regardless of absence of unitary ward variable No update that mediator tests were performed in spite of nonsignificant Q-test

Concluding Remarks Asked a vital question BUT: Problems in the introduction and examinations Confusing wording A great deal of detail was excluded that ought to have been displayed Too numerous quotatations