Social Lodging establishment/Movement workshop - "Outline for proficient upkeep" in rental lodging

0
0
1900 days ago, 664 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
new venture and portfolio KPI for arranged upkeep (1.2-1.5 % of substitution expense) ... Suggestions (Designers and upkeep supervisors to be included): Explicit subsidizing ...

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Social Housing establishment/SHiFT workshop - "Outline for proficient upkeep" in rental lodging Findings from late Building condition reviews – suggestions for plan Jacus Pienaar Land & Housing Development Support Group 30 September 2008

Slide 2

Findings in view of aftereffects of: 2007 Building condition reviews (BCAs) of 40 edifices crosswise over SA (SPSH/Rooftops) 2006-2008 Rectification investigations for: Joe Slovo Park stage 1, N2 Gateway Abahlali Housing Association – Algoa Park 2007 Assessments for Free State CRU procedure

Slide 3

2007 SPSH/Rooftops BCA program

Slide 4

40 buildings – blend of more seasoned revamped elevated structures/walk-ups and more up to date walk-ups Reports included (at 2007 consistent costs): Quantified Deferred Maintenance Liability (DML) for every venture, unit and portfolio DML = need 1 (prompt), and… need 2 (3-6m) work, not done that ought to have been Quantified and cost 20 year upkeep plan and financing need per extend, unit & portfolio

Slide 5

Condition rating framework utilized

Slide 6

20 year upkeep subsidizing needs

Slide 7

20 year upkeep financing needs

Slide 8

Condition of SHI portfolios examined against run of the mill patterns

Slide 9

Results Newly constructed/remodeled stock inadmissibly high DML and short-medium term upkeep subsidizing necessities to make up for lost time Most as of late fabricated/redesigned structures maturing rashly Problem: How to reserve get up to speed ? Require lease increments up to 40% (unrealistic) If circumstance not redressed, will achieve CR 2 (poor) inside 10-12 years and CR 1 (hopeless) inside 20 years Why?

Slide 10

Some perceptions Inadequate support spending plans and uses Little proof of arranged or preventive upkeep Poor house keeping programs Little or no regard for vitality and water administration and protection Poor workmanship, supervision and quality control in support and repair work But,… shouldn't something be said about outline?

Slide 11

What parts of plan appeared to bring about early decay? Planners forced into making insufficient arrangement for the substances and necessities of for example: Unframed, stack bearing concrete based stone work development up to 3-4 stories high The requirement for "downmarket" completions, rooftop development and covers High power utilize, particularly of bathing offices in shared convenience

Slide 12

What parts of outline appeared to bring about early crumbling? Some particular aspects of the above incorporate not accommodating: how materials perform in the long haul… and in cooperation with each other and nature, how structures will truly be utilized, "buildability" (reasonableness) of points of interest Biological rot e.g. common maturing of materials (quickened by situations), presentation to forceful synthetic specialists, environment, and so forth.)

Slide 13

What parts of plan appeared to bring about early weakening? Insufficient thoughtfulness regarding managing Water in all structures, e.g.: rising clammy rain entrance ground water weight flooding buildup

Slide 14

What parts of outline and development prepare cause early disintegration? Lacking consideration regarding managing Movement in every one of its structures (all the more particularly differential or relative development) because of: Settlement and hurl drying shrinkage compression and extension because of temperature varieties, dampness content crawl and droop (over-burdening or under outlining of structures).

Slide 15

Some cases in new development: Inadequate rooftop pitches and defensive shades Omission of rain water products Omission of skirt medications Poor specifying at intersections - Flat rooftops and parapets Inadequate weathering/fixing of top edges of parapet and balustrade dividers

Slide 16

Some cases in new development: Inadequate climate sealing of building envelope (particularly single skin outside brick work) with poor enumerating at intersections with floor chunks, rooftops and window and door jambs Inadequate fixing around window outlines, and clean fittings permitting entrance of water into the dividers and structures

Slide 17

Some cases in new development: Inadequate arrangement (joints) for development, bringing about breaking and further entrance of water Poor quality sterile and different fittings, kitchen cupboards, taps, entryways and entryway locks Inadequate tempest water regulation/transfer

Slide 18

Working or wearing administrations and segments Designers ought to dependably ask themselves: How would it be able to be come to? In what capacity would it be able to be cleaned? In what manner would it be able to be repaired? In what capacity would it be able to be supplanted?

Slide 19

Nice thought: washlines "covered up" and secure, yet generally in shade

Slide 20

So washing goes outside in sun confronting N2, giving clergyman acid reflux each time she drives past

Slide 21

In restoration of more seasoned existing structures Inadequate or no repair of broke/spalled uncovered solid section edges, prompting to pollution of steel strengthening (particularly in seaside towns) Inadequate re-fixing and re-grouting of joints that had opened up after some time and made numerous spots where water can get into structures in e.g.: Face block dividers and copings Window ledges Tiling in showers Edge intersections of clean fittings with dividers

Slide 22

In renovation of more established existing structures Inadequate re-waterproofing of old and cracked rooftops Not altering plumbing releases or supplanting blemished channeling Re-painting over old paint on rusting metal work, for example, steel window casings and emergency exit stairs without legitimate arrangement and rust control Not instantly re-fixing uncovered rooftop timbers, wood belts, entryways and window outlines maturing segments/hardware (lifts, rooftops, plumbing, windows, and so on) are regularly not supplanted or revamped amid procurement/recovery

Slide 23

Regulation of item norms and quality for lodging in South Africa 1998: Home Building Manual Technical Guidelines (reexamined 1999) of the NHBRC 2000: NDoH National Housing Code Norms and Standards houses and administrations 2003: NDoH Generic Specification GFSH-11 Design and Construction of Houses: FOCUS MAINLY ON SINGLE Story CHEAP FREE HOUSES!

Slide 24

First acknowledgment of SH needs 2006 SH Program Guidelines Project cost gauges and subsidizing needs in view of SH item (medium thickness, appended multi-story structures) Social Housing Capital Restructuring Grant (SHCRG) = more responsive financing system Lower obligation levels = enhanced quality and practicality? Shockingly overwhelmed by fast ascents in loan fees (after 2006) and building costs (progressing since 1990s)

Slide 25

Assessment of entries for SHRCG financing Three institutionalized appraisal instruments from NDoH: Quickscan A Governance and authoritative feasibility of SHI applying for the allow Quickscan B Project legitimacy, preparation and general specialized quality Quickscan C Financial display for venture practicality

Slide 26

Revision of the Quickscan evaluation handle in 2008 First round evaluations before finish of BCAP (NO organized assessment of value and upkeep isues.) BCAP drummed up bit of some excitement and brought about: More basic assessment in Quickscans A & C of: support arrangements in operational cost gauges new venture and portfolio KPI for arranged upkeep (1.2-1.5 % of substitution cost) More basic assessment in Quickscan B of: item plan and quality impact of that on future support needs

Slide 27

Conclusions BCAP has highlighted brisk decrease in physical state of as of late built/redesigned social lodging stock Already past the point where it is possible to store support excess from operational pay Building "shoddy" makes administration logic of "shabby" "Modest" outline not really sparing, and the other way around

Slide 28

Recommendations (Designers and upkeep chiefs to be included): Product must be receptive to introductory capital cost of a venture additionally to continuous operational costs Maintenance directors/specialists must be a piece of outline audit groups Sector must create execution particulars and outline rules for: new undertakings obtaining and restoration

Slide 29

Recommendations (Designers and support supervisors to be included): Explicit subsidizing conditions around quality and low upkeep required Further venture financing of social lodging improvement must be made contingent on adequate courses of action to diminish upkeep needs and liabilities If not, generous interests in the area will be to a great extent squandered on " one-era" stock

SPONSORS