Section 4 Information Gathering: Interactive Methods

Presentation Transcript

Part 4 Information Gathering: Interactive Methods Systems Analysis and Design Kendall & Kendall Sixth Edition

Major Topics Question arrange Interviewing procedures Joint Application Design (JAD) Questionnaires 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Interviewing is a vital strategy for gathering information on data framework prerequisites. Interviews uncover data about: Interviewee suppositions. Interviewee emotions. About the present condition of the framework. Authoritative and individual objectives. Casual methodology. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Planning the Interview Five stages in arranging the meeting are: Reading foundation material. Setting up meeting goals. Choosing whom to meet. Setting up the interviewee. Choosing question sorts and structure. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Question Types There are two fundamental sorts of inquiries: Open-finished. Shut. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Open-Ended Questions Open-finished inquiries questions permit interviewees to react how they wish, and to what length they wish. Open-finished inquiries are fitting when the expert is occupied with broadness and profundity of answer. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Advantages of Open-Ended Questions Eight advantages of open-finished inquiries are: Puts the interviewee calm. Permits the questioner to get on the interviewee's vocabulary. Reflect training, qualities, demeanors, and convictions. Gives wealth of detail. Uncovers roads of further scrutinizing that may have gone undiscovered. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Advantages of Open-Ended Questions Eight Benefits of open-finished inquiries are: (proceeded with) Provides more enthusiasm for the interviewee. Permits greater suddenness. Makes stating simpler for the questioner. Helpful if the questioner is ill-equipped. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Disadvantages of Open-Ended Questions The five downsides include: May bring about an excess of insignificant detail. Potentially losing control of the meeting. May set aside an excess of time for the measure of helpful data picked up. Conceivably appearing that the questioner is ill-equipped. Potentially giving the feeling that the questioner is on a "fishing endeavor" 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Closed Interview Questions Closed inquiries questions confine the quantity of conceivable reactions. Shut inquiries are proper for creating exact, dependable information that is anything but difficult to investigate. The approach is proficient, and it requires little ability for questioners to manage. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Benefits of Closed Interview Questions Six advantages are: Saving meeting time. Effectively looking at meetings. Coming to the heart of the matter. Keeping control of the meeting. Covering a vast region rapidly. Getting to important information. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Disadvantages of Closed Interview Questions Four downsides of shut inquiries questions include: Boring for the interviewee. Inability to get rich itemizing. Missing primary thoughts. Neglecting to manufacture affinity amongst questioner and interviewee. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Attributes of Open-finished and Closed Questions 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Bipolar Questions and Probes Bipolar inquiries are those that might be replied with a "yes" or "no" or "concur" or 'oppose this idea'. Bipolar inquiries ought to be utilized sparingly. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Probing Questions Probing inquiries inspire more insight about past inquiries. The motivation behind examining inquiries is: To get all the more importance. To clear up. To draw out and develop the interviewee's point. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Question Sequencing The three fundamental methods for organizing meetings are : Pyramid, beginning with shut inquiries and progressing in the direction of open-finished inquiries. Pipe, beginning with open-finished inquiries and moving in the direction of shut inquiries. Precious stone, beginning with shut, moving toward open-finished, and finishing with shut inquiries. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Pyramid Structure Begins with exceptionally point by point, regularly shut inquiries Expands by permitting open-finished inquiries and more summed up reactions Is helpful if interviewees should be warmed up to the subject or appear to be hesitant to address the theme 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Funnel Structure Begins with summed up, open-finished inquiries Concludes by narrowing the conceivable reactions utilizing shut inquiries Provides a simple, nonthreatening approach to start a meeting Is valuable when the interviewee feels sincerely about the theme 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Diamond Structure A precious stone formed structure starts in a particular manner Then more broad issues are inspected Concludes with particular inquiries Combines the quality of both the pyramid and pipe structures Takes longer than alternate structures 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Closing the Interview Always ask "Is there whatever else that you might want to include?" Summarize and give input your impressions. Ask whom you ought to chat with next. Set up any future arrangements. Express gratitude toward them for their time and shake hands. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Interview Report Write as quickly as time permits after the meeting. Give an underlying rundown, then more detail. Audit the report with the respondent. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Joint Application Design (JAD) Joint Application Design (JAD) can supplant a progression of meetings with the client group. JAD is a strategy that permits the investigator to achieve prerequisites examination and outline the UI with the clients in a gathering setting. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

When to Use JAD might be utilized when: Users are fretful and need something new. The authoritative culture bolsters joint critical thinking practices. Examiners gauge an expansion in the quantity of thoughts utilizing JAD. Faculty might be truant from their occupations for the period of time required. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

JAD Personnel JAD includes: Analysts Users Executives Observers Scribe Session pioneer 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Benefits of JAD The potential advantages of utilizing JAD are: Time is spared, contrasted and customary meeting. Quick improvement of frameworks. Enhanced client responsibility for framework. Imaginative thought creation is progressed. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Drawbacks of Using JAD Potential disadvantages of utilizing JAD will be: JAD requires a vast piece of time to be accessible for all session members. In the event that arrangement is deficient, the session may not go exceptionally well. On the off chance that the subsequent report is inadequate, the session may not be effective. The hierarchical abilities and culture may not be helpful for a JAD session. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Questionnaires are valuable in social event data from key association individuals about: Attitudes. Convictions. Practices. Attributes. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

When to Use Questionnaires are profitable if: Organization individuals are broadly scattered. Numerous individuals are included with the venture. Exploratory work is required. Critical thinking before meetings is fundamental. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Question Types Questions are outlined as either: Open-finished Try to suspect the reaction you will get. Appropriate for getting assessments. Shut Use when every one of the choices might be recorded. At the point when the alternatives are totally unrelated. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Open-Ended and Closed Questions 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Questionnaire Language Questionnaire dialect ought to be: Simple. Particular. Free of inclination. Not disparaging. In fact exact. Routed to the individuals who are educated. Suitable for the perusing level of the respondent. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Measurement Scales The two unique types of estimation scales are : Nominal. Interim. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Nominal Scales Nominal scales are utilized to order things into classes. It is the weakest type of estimation. Information might be totaled. What kind of programming do you utilize the most? 1 = Word Processor 2 = Spreadsheet 3 = Database 4 = An Email Program 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Interval Scales An interim scale is utilized when the interims are equivalent. There is no supreme zero. Cases of interim scales incorporate the Fahrenheit or centigrade scale. How helpful is the bolster given by the Technical Support Group? NOT USEFUL EXTREMELY AT ALL USEFUL 1 2 3 4 5 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Validity and Reliability Questionnaires must be substantial and solid. Unwavering quality of scales alludes to consistency accordingly - getting similar outcomes if a similar poll was directed again under similar conditions. Legitimacy is how much the question measures what the expert expects to quantify. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Problems with Scales There are three issues related with ineffectively built scales: Leniency. Focal propensity. Corona impact. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Leniency Caused by simple raters. Arrangement is to move the "normal" classification to one side or right of focus. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Central Tendency Central propensity happens when respondents rate everything as normal. Enhance by making the distinctions littler at the two finishes. Change the quality of the descriptors. Make a scale with more focuses. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall

Halo Effect When the impression shaped in one question conveys into the following inquiry Solution is to place one characteristic and a few things on each page. 2005 Pearson Prentice Hall .:tslides