Results and Factors Contributing to the Success of a Community Based Patient Self-Management Diabetes Program: The Ash

2660 days ago, 886 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Results and Factors Contributing to the Success of a Community Based Patient Self-Management Diabetes Program: The Asheville Project Daniel G. Garrett, MS Senior Director, Medication Adherence APhA Foundation

Slide 2

Objectives Describe the Asheville Project and the Outcomes being accomplished Share the impression of patients, suppliers and supervisors on the elements adding to achievement of the Asheville Project Care Model

Slide 3

Our Mission " The mission of the American Pharmacists Association Foundation is to enhance the nature of purchaser wellbeing results that are influenced by drug store."

Slide 4

Patient Centric Drug Therapy Patient is the: Applier Utilizer Determiner ...of the results connected with prescription "innovation" Patients on medication treatment at last " deal with their own particular care ".

Slide 5

Original Intent of the North Carolina Pharmaceutical Care Project-1993 To show that group drug specialists could give pharmaceutical care that outcomes in positive patient results To exhibit the estimation of pharmaceutical care to businesses so they would pay drug specialists for "clinical" administrations

Slide 6

Original Design of the NC Pharmaceutical Care Project Committee with delegates from all state drug store associations, schools of drug store, industry and a PBM Met for a long time to concoct convention for 3 ventures (asthma, diabetes and HTN) in 3 groups, with control gatherings and PC programming bolstered mind ($150,000 sticker price) ECHO display for results following

Slide 7

*" The Answer to How? Is When." Decided in 1996 to attempt one anticipate in one ailment state utilizing pencil and paper The City of Asheville consented to strive for one year and check whether it worked before they paid the drug specialists Diabetes was chosen by the City's Medical Consultant as the place to begin The drug specialists preparing system was made in conjunction with the MSJ DEC with a concede of $10,000 The City chose to postpone tolerant co-pays and the PBM issued extraordinary rx cards The first patients were recognized from a PBM report with a yellow highlighter *Peter Block, Stewardship, 1993; 234-237

Slide 8

The Asheville Project

Slide 9

"You can't control the framework… you can just irritate it" Bennett Sims, Servanthood, Leadership for the third Millennium

Slide 10

Patient Incentives and Care Model (how we "bothered the framework") Patient choice/enlistment Patient instruction — Mission + St. Joseph's Diabetes Center Matching patients to drug specialists Incentives Glucose meters PBM co-pay waivers Labs without co-pays The agent word in pharmaceutical care is " mind " (Madge Testimonial)

Slide 12

How They Do It "Understanding settling on better sustenance decision. Blood glucose abundantly progressed. 2 x 1.5c cm wound RLE. Alluded to doctor for assessment and treatment."

Slide 13

Asheville Clinical Outcomes: Avg. Glycosylated Hemoglobin HbA 1c n=136 136 81 55 39 26 16 11 Cranor et. al. JAPhA 2003; 43(2): 175-176.

Slide 14

70 n=50 Cranor et. al. JAPhA 2003; 43(2): 184.

Slide 15

Asheville Enrollee Average Total Healthcare Costs Cranor, JAPhA 2003:43(2); 183.

Slide 16

$8468 $8088 $7762 Total Healthcare Costs, Combined Missions St Josephs and City of Asheville for all enrollees (unpublished information) COA & MSJ Total Healthcare Costs (avg/persistent/year) before program for diabetes and every year of the program for 1 st 5 years $7485 20% Medical CPI Increase $2,195,228 Cumulative reserve funds $7239

Slide 17

City of Asheville Diabetes Sick-Leave Usage (n=37) Cranor et. al. JAPhA; 43 (2): 180.

Slide 18

The Asheville Project: Participant's Perceptions of Factors Contributing to the Success of a Patient Self-Management Diabetes Program Focus gatherings of patients and diabetes mind suppliers and individual meetings with directors required in the venture 21 patients, 4 drug specialists, 1 CDE, 6 supervisors from boss gatherings Garrett DG, Martin, LA. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;43:185-90

Slide 19

Patient Perspective "The program spared my life" Patients were certain about experience and appreciated association with drug specialist Reasons for joining the program: Financial motivator Fear of finding Garrett DG and Martin LA. JAPhA March/April ;43(2):187.

Slide 20

Employers' Perspective Significant assets were required to run the program; be that as it may, the advantages inferred far exceeded the expenses of the program Employees acknowledged diminishments in therapeutic costs Enhanced patient prosperity and diminished non-attendance Patients feeling of seek after controlling their diabetes was expanded Garrett DG and Martin LA. JAPhA March/April 2003; 43(2): 187.

Slide 21

Pharmacist Perspective Participated in program since Professional obligation (have any kind of effect) Increased attractiveness in vocation Pharmacists distinguished two essential components that influenced patients' achievement in the program: Whether the individual saw his or her wellbeing as a need The eagerness of the human services proficient to require some serious energy with patients Garrett DG and Martin LA. JAPhA, March/April, 2003 43:(2) 188

Slide 22

Wagner Interminable Care Model The wellbeing framework is a piece of the bigger group and there are proper connections to medicinal services assets in the group. Successful self-administration support and connections to persistent arranged group assets educate patients and families and propel them to adapt to the difficulties of living with and treating incessant sicknesses. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C et al. Enhancing perpetual sickness mind: making an interpretation of proof vigorously. Wellbeing Aff 2001; 20(6):64-78.

Slide 23

Wagner Perpetual Care Model Teams of doctors and other human services suppliers need the clinical and behavioral ability required for profitable patient cooperations. Rules and conventions have an insignificant effect unless they are executed as a feature of a progressing arrangement of care that incorporates instruction, updates, expert inclusion, and choice bolster mediations. A composed and institutionalized way to deal with gathering, abridging, and checking on individual and total patient information is required. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Enhancing interminable ailment mind: making an interpretation of confirmation enthusiastically. Wellbeing Aff 2001;20(5):64-78.

Slide 24

Results from Focus Groups predictable with Wagner & partners Chronic Care Model Employer premium was in enhancing and planning human services and putting assets in a group based framework Patients reported that the impetuses and group based self-administration bolster they got on a continuous premise was key in helping them adapt to their diabetes Pharmacists and diabetes instructors reported it took more than information to watch over patients. Key to achievement was the open door drug specialists needed to work with individual patients on a continuous premise to answer their inquiries and bolster their self-inspired conduct changes On-going Outcomes Data gathered and reported Garrett DG and Martin LA. JAPhA 2003;43(2):189.

Slide 25

The "Asheville Program" Today Now more than 800 patients from 3 bosses are selected for diabetes, asthma, hypertension and lipid treatment administration Patients keep on having enhanced results & expanded medicine adherence half lessening in wiped out days Zero laborers comp guarantees in the City diabetes amass more than 6 years Average net reserve funds of over $1,600 per individual with diabetes every year from year 2 on

Slide 26

Lessons Learned that can Applied Anywhere "Arrangements are nothing, arranging is everything" the foreknowledge and far reaching arranging of "the board of trustees" brought about a sound procedure of care and accumulation of profitable results information CAREing has the effect the City paid the drug specialists before the information was in The most ideal approach to decrease hazard is to share chance each partner had a motivating force to succeed

Slide 27

Jerry McGuire "Demonstrate to me the cash!" "It's about connections"

Slide 28

Question Asked in Asheville in 1996 What are you going to do in the event that "it" works? ( Will drug specialists be ready/ready to take care of the demand for patient care administrations?) "It" works… as provided details regarding the front page of the Washington Post , August 20, 2002.

Slide 29

"What Are You Going to Do in the event that It Works?" Process versus showing research How would we scale this up for substantial bosses in different markets? How would we guarantee consistency of care and results? In what manner would we be able to make this effective? What are the parts of administer to positive results?

Slide 30

Patient Self-Management: Diabetes Program Improving the Health of America's Workforce and Reducing Health Care Costs Empower the Patient. Enhance the Outcomes. Control the Costs. SM

Slide 31

PSM: Diabetes Pilot Sites

Slide 32

"Vital" or "Comprehensive" methodologies are required for "change" (versus "interpretation") See Ken Wilber, Marriage of Sense and Soul At slightest four quadrants… biological(technical), mental, social and social are required for constant wellbeing administration John Nash deals with his wellbeing through development and support in all quadrants, if the condition of NJ had constrained him to leave his home to fabricate a scaffold would this have unfavorably influenced his wellbeing? "It's a brilliant thing to have a Beautiful Mind , yet more awesome to have a Beautiful Heart"

Slide 33

Can a Ripple in a Mountain Stream Start a Wave Across the Ocean?