Planning Organizational Structures

Designing organizational structures l.jpg
1 / 31
0
0
1251 days ago, 434 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Section 8 Learning Goals. What are the five auxiliary building hinders that directors use to plan organizations?What are the five sorts of departmentalization?How can the level of centralization/ - decentralization be changed to make an association more successful?How do robotic and natural associations contrast?.

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Planning Organizational Structures Chapter 8

Slide 2

Chapter 8 Learning Goals W cap are the five basic building hinders that administrators use to outline associations? W cap are the five sorts of departmentalization? H ow can the level of centralization/ - decentralization be changed to make an association more effective? H ow do robotic and natural associations vary?

Slide 3

Chapter 8 Learning Goals (cont'd.) W cap is the distinction between line positions and staff positions? W cap is the objective of reengineering? H ow does the casual association influence the execution of an organization? W cap patterns are impacting the way organizations sort out?

Slide 4

Organizing : the way toward planning and apportioning a company's assets so that the firm can do its arrangements and accomplish its objectives (one of the four exercises of administration)

Slide 5

Learning Goal 1 W cap are the five auxiliary building hinders that directors use to outline associations? Division of work Process of isolating work into partitioned occupations Assigning undertakings to specialists Departmentalization Managerial chain of importance Levels of administration inside the association Managerial traverse of control Number of representatives the chief straightforwardly directs Amount of centralization or decentralization in the association Deciding at which level in the association choices ought to be made Centralization is degree to which formal expert is gathered in one zone or level of the association

Slide 6

5 Structural Building Blocks 1. Division of Labor 2. Departmentalization 3. Administrative Hierarchy 4. Traverse of Control 5. Centralization of Decision-Making

Slide 7

1. Division of Labor Division of Labor : the way toward partitioning work into discrete employments and allotting errands to specialists

Slide 8

Learning Goal 2 W cap are the five sorts of departmentalization? Practical – in view of essential capacities performed inside a hierarchical unit Product – in light of the merchandise or administrations delivered or sold by the authoritative unit Process – in light of the generation procedure utilized by the hierarchical unit Customer – in view of the essential kind of client served by the hierarchical unit Geographic – in light of geographic division of hierarchical units

Slide 9

2. Departmentalization : the way toward gathering employments together so that comparative or related errands and exercises can be facilitated

Slide 10

2. Departmentalization Types of Departmentalization 1. Utilitarian 2. Item 3. Prepare 4. Client 5. Geographic

Slide 11

3. Administrative Hierarchy Managerial Hierarchy : the levels of administration inside an association; ordinarily incorporates top, center, and supervisory levels

Slide 12

Managerial Pyramid Top Management Power Number of Employees Middle Management Supervisory Management

Slide 13

4. Traverse of Control Span of Control : the quantity of representatives an administrator straightforwardly directs

Slide 14

4. Traverse of Control Factors Determining Span of Control 1. Nature of the errand 2. Area of the laborers 3. Capacity of administrator to delegate 4. Measure of collaboration and input amongst director and specialists 5. Level of ability and inspiration of the specialists

Slide 15

Learning Goal 3 H ow can the level of centralization/decentralization be modified to make an association more fruitful? Centralization permits best supervisors To build up a wide perspective of operations To practice tight monetary controls Highly decentralized associations give bring down level faculty More obligation Power to settle on and execute choices Decentralization can bring about Faster basic leadership Increased advancement and responsiveness to client inclinations

Slide 16

Centralization : how much formal expert is packed in one territory or level of an association Decentralization: pushing choice - making expert down the hierarchical progression, giving lower-level laborers greater duty

Slide 17

Mechanistic association Relatively high level of work specialization Rigid departmentalization Many layers of administration Narrow ranges of control Centralized basic leadership Long hierarchy of leadership Results in a tall authoritative structure Organic association Relatively low level of work specialization Loose departmentalization Few levels of administration Wide traverses of control Decentralized basic leadership Short levels of leadership Results in a level hierarchical structure Learning Goal 4 H ow do robotic and natural associations contrast?

Slide 18

Mechanistic versus Natural Structures

Slide 19

Organic Structure Example Chuck Knight, CEO of Emerson Electric, portrays his hierarchical rationality: "We sort out around issues and openings - not around an association outline." "We couldn't care less about structure or shape - we think about completing things." "We plan and control benefits at the most reduced conceivable level." Source: Neff & Citrin: Lessons from the Top, 1999, pp. 199-203.

Slide 20

Line Positions Directly included in the procedures used to make merchandise and enterprises Typically found in ranges, for example, Production Marketing Finance Staff Positions Provide the authoritative and bolster benefits that line workers need to accomplish the association's objectives Found in zones, for example, Legal advising Managerial counseling Public relations Human asset administration Learning Goal 5 W cap is the distinction between line positions and staff positions?

Slide 21

Common Organizational Structures 1. Line association clear hierarchy of leadership 2. Line-and-staff association line positions & staff positions 3. Board of trustees structure bunches 4. Lattice structure consolidates utilitarian and item departmentalization

Slide 22

Learning Goal 6 W cap is the objective of reengineering? Reengineering is the entire update of business structures and procedures keeping in mind the end goal to enhance operations Goal of reengineering Redesign business procedures to accomplish upgrades in: Cost control Product quality Customer benefit Speed

Slide 23

Reengineering : the total overhaul of business structures and procedures so as to enhance operations

Slide 24

Reengineering Example Mike Vokema, CEO of Herman Miller, evaluated that 80% of costs originated from association of the organization Herman Miller was reengineered by: disguising the association of top administration beginning without any preparation with another initiative group patching up item improvement with cross-useful departmentalization Source: Neff & Citrin: Lessons from the Top, 1999, pp. 319-326.

Slide 25

Learning Goal 7 H ow does the casual association influence the execution of an organization? Casual associations Give representatives more control over their workplace by conveying a consistent stream of organization data, helping representatives remain educated Informal connections can be: Between individuals at the same various leveled level Between individuals at various levels and in various offices

Slide 26

The Informal Organization : the system of associations and channels of correspondence in view of the casual connections of people inside an association

Slide 27

Functions of the Informal Organization 1. Fellowships & social contact 2. Data & feeling of control over workplace 3. Wellspring of status & acknowledgment

Slide 28

The Informal Organization Social system investigation: the mapping of social connections among people in an association Consultants for Ernst & Young spared a vehicle industry provider an expected $14 million by applying interpersonal organization examination to enhance correspondence Source: Entrepreneur, Jan. 2000, p. 110.

Slide 29

Learning Goal 8 W cap patterns are impacting the way organizations compose? Virtual partnerships Network of autonomous organizations connected by data innovation to share aptitudes, expenses, and access to each other's business sectors Allows organizations to meet up rapidly to misuse quickly changing open doors Key traits are innovation, advantage, brilliance, trust, and no fringes Large worldwide mergers Raise vital issues in authoritative structure

Slide 30

Trends Affecting Organizational Structure Increase in the Virtual Corporation More predominant need to structure for worldwide mergers

Slide 31

Virtual Company Example General Life, a virtual extra security organization, lessens settled costs (80% of conventional organization costs) by subcontracting: application handling, guaranteeing, commission bookkeeping, policyholder benefit, operator arrangements, innovation improvement, delineation plan & bolster, approach documenting and permitting, and affirm administration Source: Best's Review, May 1998: www.ambest.com

SPONSORS