Part 6 Interpretation of Wills

0
0
1838 days ago, 682 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Part 6 Interpretation of Wills

Slide 2

Admission of Extrinsic Evidence Mahoney v. Granger If will dialect not questionable, why prohibit outward proof Use of extraneous confirmation to clarify uncertain expression "beneficiaries at law" Is their a distinction amongst dormant and patent ambiguities? Do you concur with the "plain signifying" run the show? Could the will in light of the certainties of who was decedent's beneficiary be seen as questionable adequate to concede extraneous confirmation? Pg. 412, issue 2

Slide 3

Fleming v. Morrison Is proof allowable that a will is a sham? Ought to the attorney have arranged the will?

Slide 4

No Residue of a Residue Rule T gives property to An and B A predeceases T. Where does A's share go. Slip by statute No deposit of a buildup run The customary law Residue of Residue Rule

Slide 5

Estate of Russell

Slide 6

Erickson v. Erickson What are the certainties of this case?

Slide 7

Should legal advisor be obligated in negligence for drafting an uncertain report?

Slide 8

Classification of Legacies General ($10,000 to A) Specific (Car to B) Demonstrative ($10,000 to A from record at Y Bank) Residuary

Slide 9

Void and Lapsed Bequests Void Bequests Lapsed general and particular inheritances Lapsed residuary endowments No deposit of a buildup Residue of a deposit lead

Slide 10

Anti-pass Statutes Reasons for: Effect of: Protected Person Substituted person(s)

Slide 11

Problems T wills property to A forever, then to B. An and B survive T. In any case, B bites the dust before A leaving issue who survive A. Is the blessing to B spared by the pass statute? Assume B had passed on before T with issue who survive T. Same result? Assume B had passed on before T with no issue who survive T. Same result?

Slide 12

Allen v. Talley

Slide 13

Problems in the Book Page 444, Problem 1 Page 444, Problem 2

Slide 14

Jackson v. Schultz To my significant other Bessie, to her hers and her beneficiaries and allocates perpetually

Slide 15

Jackson v. Schultz To my significant other Bessie, to her beneficiaries and doles out everlastingly

Slide 16

Jackson v. Schultz To my significant other Bessie, to her beneficiaries and additionally appoints perpetually

Slide 17

Problem, page 449, #2 Who takes if "no buildup of deposit administer applies." Who takes if "deposit of deposit control" applies Who might T likely have needed to take? In what manner may statutes be reconsidered to get to T's goal?

Slide 18

Application to Class Gifts What is a class blessing Should statute apply to class blessing? How can it apply?

Slide 19

Dawson v. Yucus What are the realities this case? Why may the arrangement of a blessing as a class blessing be applicable if a class part kicks the bucket before the deceased benefactor? What did the court hold? Do you concur?

Slide 20

To my better half forever and upon her demise to my niece Elizabeth and the Emily 5. What do you think about Romer's thinking on page 457? Is this a sensible choice? In re Moss

Slide 21

Ademption Application to particular endowments Identity Theory (1969 UPC) Wasserman v. Cohen Intent Theory (1990 UPC)

Slide 22

Avoidance of Ademption Classification of inheritance as non-particular Construe will at time of death Exceptions (conservator deals)

Slide 23

Problems Page 466, Problem 1

Slide 24

Satisfaction of Legacies Analogous to progression Applicable to general estates

Slide 25

Common law lead Statutory administer Which bodes well? Exemption of liens

Slide 26

Increases Stock parts Dividends paid in stock Dividends paid in real money

Slide 27

Abatement—Who Pays the Freight Charges Undisposed of property Residuary General Specific Demonstratives

Slide 28

Iowa Abatement Statute 633.438 Undisposed of property Residue but to life partner Generals but to mate Specifics but to life partner Property going to life partner

SPONSORS