Part 4 - The President s National Security Powers

0
0
1908 days ago, 615 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Nature of Foreign and Domestic Powers. The Court presumes that there is a principal contrast in the sorts of forces the president requirements for outside and residential powersClearly military activities and dangers are differentWhat about exchange and business issues?What about movement and other human rights issues?Are household issues truly simply local, or do most have universal implicati

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

´╗┐Part 4 - The President " s National Security Powers

Slide 2

The Nature of Foreign and Domestic Powers The Court presumes that there is a basic distinction in the sorts of forces the president requirements for remote and household controls Clearly military activities and dangers are diverse What about exchange and business issues? Shouldn't something be said about migration and other human rights issues? Are local issues truly quite recently residential, or do most have global ramifications? Is it accurate to say that they are truly easier than outside issues?

Slide 3

The Prize Cases, 67 U.S. (2 Black) 635 (1863) - 67 What hastened this case? Why didn't the president go to Congress for an announcement of war? What did the president arrange? What is the offended party attempting to get for this situation?

Slide 4

The Legal Background Where does the law of prize and catch originate from? Jus belli What is the lawful essential to legitimately seizing ships at a bar? Is this a War? Can the president pronounce war? What war powers did the early congress give the president? What was the president reacting to?

Slide 5

Ratification Did Congress approve the activity once they were back in session? How does the lion's share treat this confirmation? Does the dominant part say that this approval was essential?

Slide 6

The Dissent Assuming that it was fundamental, what was the difference's issue with a post activity approval? Why does the dominant part dismiss this position? Has this view won? What does the superfund laws enlighten us concerning this? What did the difference say was fundamental before the president could make this as a crisis move? How do the nonconformists see this activity without a presentation of war?

Slide 7

Note 1 - The Mexican War Fleming v Page - 1851 President orders seizure of a Mexican port Does this make it US domain? What is the president's lawful part in coordinating the seizure? Military officer or arrangement producer? Does the president's seizure of the port make it US region? Keep in mind the Halls of Montezuma in the Marine Hymn?

Slide 8

Note 2 - Repealing Invasions Martin v. Mott - 1813 Congress passes a law saying the president can repulse intrusions and manage insurgences. What does the Court say in regards to who gets the chance to choose if there is an attack? Is this choice reviewable in court? Is this exemplary organization concession?

Slide 9

Presidential Uses of Military Power - p 72 1. Activities for which congressional approval was guaranteed 7 2. Maritime self-preservation 1 3. Requirement of law against robbery, no trespass 1 4. Authorization of law against robbery, specialized trespass 7 5. Arrivals to secure nationals before 1862 13 6. Arrivals to ensure residents, 1865-1967 56 7. Attack of remote or questioned domain, no battle 10 8. Intrusion of remote or debated domain, battle 10 9. Retaliations against natives 9

Slide 10

Continued 10. Different retaliations not approved by statute 4 11. Minatory showings without battle 6 12. Mediation in Panama 1 13. Extended control of Caribbean states 6 14. Activities expecting World War II 15. Besieging of Laos 1 16. Korean and Vietnamese Wars 2 17. Incidental 2 How does this confirm Napoleon's attestation that, "Authority has a place with he who utilizes it?"

Slide 11

Can Congress restrain the president's energy to complete war?

Slide 12

Little v. Barreme, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 170 (1804) - p 77 Who is the litigant? What did he do? What did the statute give? Was this ship headed for France? Why did the chief think he could grab a ship headed from a French port?

Slide 13

The Legal Issues What lawful hypothesis did the ship's proprietors use to sue the Captain? Does the court choose whether, had there not been a law, would this have been inside the president's forces? What is the impact of the law in this present courts' view? What is the effect on the skipper of the court's choice? Who might need to pay the harms today? What was diverse in that period?

Slide 14

Note 3 - Does it Matter if the War is Undeclared? What have a few researchers contended substitutes for a formal revelation of war in the post-WW II clashes? Does it make a difference for global law whether the established comforts are taken after on the off chance that we make it clear when we are at war and with who?

Slide 15

9/11 and War What did the president say in regards to war with al Quada? Why is this legitimately critical? How is this war unique in relation to late wars? What have been the impacts on household approach? What does it intend to a detainee of this kind of war?

Slide 16

The President's Emergency Powers

Slide 17

In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890) What happened and what is the court inspecting? Did Congress disallow this activity? How does the court legitimize this with segment 2, article 3, the "take care" statement? Could a sheriff in CA do this under CA law? Why is this significant to the government case?

Slide 18

Is there a Statutory Alternative to an Emergency Action? What could the feds have done to ensure the equity that would not have prompt to this discussion? Is this household or remote? What occurred on account of Kostza? Why does it make a difference where Kostza was snatched? Why does the difference dismiss the utilization of the "take mind clause"?

Slide 19

Note 3 - The Pullman strike What where Pullman autos? What were Pullman watchmen? Why might their strike influence the sends? How was the lawful reason for the president's directive to prevent the strike unique in relation to that in Youngstown?

Slide 20

Note 4 - The Emancipation Proclamation Where did this free the slaves? Why does this make a difference? What might be the legitimate issue in the event that he liberated the slaves in the North? What did free the slaves in the North? Why did it should be a revision?

Slide 21

Are Presidential Emergency Powers Implicit? What does this mean: Rulers travel every which way; governments end and types of government change; however power survives. A political society can't persevere without an incomparable will some place. Sway is never held in anticipation.

Slide 22

Home Building & Loan Assn. v. Blaisdell, 290 U.S. 398, 425-426 (1934) Emergency does not make control. Crisis does not increment allowed power or evacuate or lessen the confinements forced upon power conceded or saved. The Constitution was received in a time of grave crisis. Its stipends of energy to the Federal Government and its confinements of the forces of the States were resolved in the light of crisis and they were not adjusted by crisis. What power was accordingly conceded and what impediments were in this manner forced are inquiries which have dependably been, and dependably will be, the subject of close examination under our protected framework. What crisis was this case taking a gander at?

Slide 23

Saving the Union Compare and appear differently in relation to Lincoln's question of whether we can spare the Constitution yet lose the country. What is saying that the president has the power, yet not the lawful expert, to act in local crises? What can happen in the event that he does acts illegally? Will congress restrain these crisis powers? Does it make a difference where they are attempting to breaking point them locally or for outside activities? Is this superior to having congress give him boundless crisis powers?

Slide 24

Keeping Secrets Quick audit - who does the corporate/Whitehouse guide speak to? Why does this make a difference? What did the court find for Hilary's situation? Is there an established appropriate to free for legislative data? What does this educate us regarding the lawful reason for the president to withhold data from general society?

Slide 25

FOIA Review What is the statutory reason for community to administrative data? What does it accommodate data about national security? Does the administration even need to tell the court whether it has the reports that are looked for in a demand for data? Do these apply to Congressional examinations? What might confine congress? Where does partition of forces come in? What is the diverse between the interchanges benefit and the deliberative procedure benefit? Which one is truly in light of detachment of forces instead of conventional customary law benefits?

Slide 26

Executive Privilege Nixon v. US What if the president had pulverized the tapes before anybody had requested them? Why wouldn't he be able to do it after the excellent jury subpoena? How did Nixon legitimize not discharging the tapes? Did Cox discover clear proof for an authentic presidential benefit? Did they make Nixon surrender the tapes? Would it have mattered if this had been a congressional subpoena, as opposed to a great jury subpoena?

SPONSORS