IAQG 9120:2009 Revision Overview

Presentation Transcript

IAQG 9120:2009 Revision Overview Prepared by IAQG 9120 Team Rev: 2 Dated: 15 July 2009

Overview Objectives Provide a diagram of: 9120 Team Membership 9120 Revision Process 9120:2009 Key Changes (Revisions/Relocated, Additions, Deletions Requirements) 9120 Implementation Schedule

9120 Team Membership 8 Members on 9120 Team Representing: Americas, Europe, and Asia-Pacific IAQG Sectors Distributors, OEMs and Associations Both Production and Aftermarket

9120 Stakeholders Civil Aviation Authorities Defense Industry and Authorities Space Industry and Authorities Certification/Registration Bodies Trade Associations Suppliers IAQG Member Companies IAQG Strategy Streams and Teams

9120 Revision Objectives Incorporate ISO 9001:2008 changes Ensure arrangement with IAQG methodology (on-time, on-quality execution ) Align with IAQG 9100:2009 changes Adopt new necessities in light of partner needs Improve existing prerequisites where partners recognized requirement for illumination, including when an archived technique is required

9120 Revision Process Project Mgmt Design Specification & IAQG Strategy > 9120 goals Started in Dec 2005 1 st 9120 Team Meeting October 2006 Stakeholder Input Web study Data mining and Consolidation - 84 things MCRT (Master Comments Review Template) Review handle  Design Specification & IAQG Strategy > 9100 and 9120 targets MCRT Accept/Reject/Proposals/Comments 80 % acknowledged

9120 Revision Process 9120 draft 16 April 2007 Writing the principal draft - arranged by the copyist 9120 draft 7 August 2007 Review of the main draft * IAQG Meeting - October 2007 Review of Coordination Draft (Dec 2007) : Stakeholder Comments Reviewed by: Each Sector for agreement reaction Entire group (in Naples) for conclusive resolutions before formal ticket 9120 coord draft Nov 2007 * IAQG Meeting - April 2008

9120 Revision Process Preparation for Formal Sector Ballot Development of sending bolster material Formal Ballot Jan 2009 Limit date for remarks Mar 2009 9120 Formal Ballot Jan 2009 New ISO 9001 timetable (TC176 changed their assessed discharge date from June 2009 to October 2008) 9100 Revision Effort Completion: Dec 2008 AS/EN 9100 Publication: January 2009 AS/EN 9120 Publication: May 2009

9120:2009 Key Changes Title – Distributors (evacuated " S tockist ") Clause 1 - 9120 Scope and Application Revision: Scope reached out to incorporate Defense and in addition Aviation and Space Application direction gave when 9100, 9110, and 9120 are proper for utilize Rationale: The 9120 based QMS is pertinent to other complex frameworks and would get advantage from usage including area and ocean based applications Implementation/Audit Considerations: Increased utilize and enhanced comprehension of when the different avionics, space, and safeguard principles are appropriate

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 3.3 & 3.7 – Counterfeit Part/Suspected Unapproved Part (SUP) Addition : Define distinction amongst fake and unapproved parts in the inventory network Counterfeit Parts are: false impersonations of existing items have no specialist for utilize SUPs are: parts or items that have obscure expert or and might possibly be adequate

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 3.5 - Risk Addition: Define new term "hazard" An undesirable circumstance or condition that has both a probability of happening and a conceivably contrary outcome Rationale: The comprehension of hazard is critical for an association to build up a proactive quality administration framework Implementation/Audit Considerations: Understanding this term is imperative to actualize a hazard administration prepare in the relevant statements

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 4.1 – QMS General necessities Revision/Relocation: The association's QMS should address client and material statutory and administrative QMS prerequisites (beforehand situated in the QMS documentation § 4.2.1) Rationale: Clarify that the prerequisite is set at the QMS level and not just at the documentation level Implementation/Audit Considerations: The idea of "fundamental QMS" might be utilized (procedures relevant to all clients/exercises), however the records, for example, Quality Management Plans, which address particular clients prerequisites, might be considered as a component of the QMS

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 4.2.2 – Quality Manual Relationships Deletion: Requirement to make a report demonstrating the relationship between 9120 necessities and the associations recorded strategies Rationale: Requirement enhances guaranteeing item quality. Prerequisite was seen as prescriptive in that it determines a specific strategy for guaranteeing the necessities of the standard have been met Implementation/Audit Considerations: Auditors need to recognize suitable archived methodology as a characteristic piece of doing the review

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 4.2.4 – Record Retention Requirement Deletion: Requirement to keep up records for a long time min. Justification: Conflicts with Regulatory/Customer necessities Requirement was seen as prescriptive in that it determines a specific technique for guaranteeing the prerequisites of the standard have been met Implementation/Audit Considerations: Auditors need to distinguish fitting record maintenance necessities per contracts as a characteristic piece of completing the review

9120:2009 Key Changes Clauses 5.2/8.2.1 – Customer Focus/Satisfaction Addition: Top administration might guarantee that item congruity and on-time conveyance execution are measured and that suitable move is made if arranged outcomes are not, or won't be, accomplished. (5.2) Information to be observed and utilized for the assessment of consumer loyalty might incorporate, however is not restricted to: item congruity on-time conveyance execution client grievances restorative activity demands Organizations might create and actualize plans for consumer loyalty change that address inadequacies recognized by these assessments, and evaluate the adequacy of the outcomes (8.2.1 )

9120:2009 Key Changes Clauses 5.2/8.2.1 – Customer Focus/Satisfaction (Continued) Rationale: Establish clear relationship between the QMS and hierarchical execution, in accordance with IAQG procedure To advance ceaseless change of consumer loyalty Implementation/Audit Considerations: Review of administration center and authoritative procedure to quantify consumer loyalty and plan enhancements

9120:2009 Key Changes Clauses 7.1 – Planning of Product Realization Addition: This Clause is NOT EXCLUDED for Distributors Rationale: Distributors have an "item" (benefit) they give Controls and reports the requirement for item acknowledgment to be arranged notwithstanding different necessities of the standard Allows presentation of different contemplations required by the business (design administration) Implementation/Audit Considerations: Clause 7.1 ought to be considered in any framework appraisal for a merchant

9120:2009 Key Changes 7.1.1/7.5.3 - Configuration Management Addition: Deemed pertinent to Distributors Structured in accordance with ISO 10007 prerequisites Rationale: Focuses setup administration on the item and how it is maintained all through item acknowledgment Implementation/Audit Considerations: Some level of arrangement administration is normal for all items at all levels of the store network in consistence with prohibition criteria (see provision 1.2 )

9120:2009 Key Changes 7.1.2 – Work Transfer Addition : The association must have a procedure to arrange and control the exchange exercises Expanded to cover lasting exchange (e.g. starting with one association then onto the next, from one association to provider, starting with one provider then onto the next ) Rationale: Work exchange can happen at whatever time amid item acknowledgment Addresses issues that frequently happen amid work exchanges Implementation/Audit Considerations: A procedure must exist to control the exchange of work including arranging and resulting control of the exchange

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 7.4.1 – Recognition of Supplier Quality Data Revision: Added note to perceive that one variable that might be utilized amid provider determination and assessment is objective and solid information from outer sources Rationale: Recognition that the business pattern is to utilize remotely given provider execution information (e.g. Online Aerospace Supplier Information System – OASIS, Nadcap) Implementation/Audit Considerations: Note just

9120:2009 Key Changes Clause 7.4.1 – Approval status for providers Revision: Added and gave cases of "endorsement status" (e.g. affirmed, contingent, objected) and cases of "extent of endorsement" (e.g. item sort, handle family). The association must characterize the procedure for providers endorsement status choices or changes Rationale: Clarify that the conditions for utilizing a provider relies on upon its endorsement status Implementation/Audit Considerations: The procedure, duties and specialist must be characterized for this procedure

9100:2009 Key Changes Clause 8.2.4 – Sampling Inspection Revision: When the association utilizes testing examination as a method for item acknowledgment, the examining arrangement should be defended on the premise of perceived measurable standards and proper for utilize (i.e., coordinating the examining plan to the criticality of the item and to the procedure capacity ) Rationale: Numerous solicitations were gotten to enhance statement 8.2.4. The remarks went from that it was factually erroneous, to that it was excessively prescriptive Implementation/Audit Considerations: Validation of perceived measurable princip