Four-dimensional web mapping and ecological information mashups

1843 days ago, 643 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Four-dimensional web mapping and natural information mashups Jon Blower Reading e-Science Center Environmental Systems Science Center University of Reading United Kingdom

Slide 2

4-D web mapping various mapping frameworks are presently accessible on the web Increasing number of OGC WMS-consistent servers Most mapping programming accept static, two-dimensional information (x-y) Environmental science information is dynamic and four-dimensional (x-y-z-t) Other measurements conceivable, e.g. ghastly band OGC WMS bolsters 4(plus)- D information But not a lot of servers or customers bolster the full spec

Slide 3

NetCDF (Common Data Form) Increasingly turning into the accepted standard for some sorts of ecological information Highly appropriate for 4-D information Augmented by Climate and Forecast (CF) metadata benchmarks BIG in addition to for interoperability! Utilize if at all conceivable You'll profit by heaps of apparatuses that see CF-NetCDF We have composed a WMS for uncovering pictures of information from 4D NetCDF documents ...and a geo-site interface to the WMS. Intended to be simple for outsiders to get and utilize. Can likewise read information by means of OPeNDAP

Slide 4

Godiva2 WMS Could utilize pictures from numerous different WMSs DATA metadata (XML) pictures (PNG) WMS = OGC-agreeable Web Map Service Web server HTML, Javascript Web server and WMS could be co-found

Slide 5

The Godiva2 site NetCDF information changed over to pictures on the fly and served through a WMS. Shown in a draggable, zoomable guide (OpenLayers)

Slide 6

Selection of profundity Depth mapped onto ELEVATION measurement of WMS

Slide 7

Selection of time (range) WMS underpins the TIME measurement Selection of a period run prompts to era of a movement

Slide 8

Finding the information esteem at a point Click on the information layer, information esteem is demonstrated Uses GetFeatureInfo piece of WMS detail

Slide 9

Timeseries plots If a period range is chosen, can make a timeseries plot at a point Uses GetFeatureInfo with a period run and "format=image/png"

Slide 10

Viewing in Google Earth Godiva2 site contains connection to stack as of now unmistakable information in Google Earth Our WMS yields in KMZ organization Can then view information close by other KML datasets Can see livelinesss of information No issue with guide projections! In spite of the fact that overlays still look clever close to the posts… Can't communicate with the information as much as is conceivable on the site

Slide 11

Lessons learned We needed to make a few augmentations to WMS to serve our necessities SCALE parameter for shading scale changes Piecemeal serving of metadata (entire Capabilities report can develop expansive) Key specialized test is mapping (lon,lat) to (i,j) productively Made troublesome by outlandish arrange ref frameworks (e.g. NEMO tripolar) Slow reaction would slaughter client inertia Not numerous WMS servers and customers execute the WMS spec completely and accurately (or effectively) We are encouraging back our discoveries to the group Community would profit by a decent quality electronic 4-D WMS interface This ought to be a group advancement exertion Any volunteers to participate?

Slide 12

Environmental information mashups

Slide 13

What is a mashup? Taking at least two "things" that were freely created and assembling them to such an extent that the subsequent entire is more noteworthy than the total of the parts Requires adherence to normal measures Helped by straightforward interfaces and configurations WMS, GeoRSS, KML… RESTful Web Services more appropriate than SOAPy ones (HTTP GET is considerably more mashup-accommodating than HTTP POST) But you can't do everything with basic frameworks E.g. utilize a mashup to investigate or create a speculation, then a more refined framework to do complex examination

Slide 14

Mashup 1: Ocean science DAMOCLES (Arctic ice) NetCDF Java program KML WMS KML KMZ Google Earth ARGO glide information DRAKKAR display information (NEMO code) Useful for checking model results against acclimatized perceptions to search for abnormalities

Slide 15

Pop-up shows information from ARGO skim

Slide 16

Mashup 2: Hurricane Katrina SST information from Met Office FOAM demonstrate Output from TRACK program plain content NetCDF Python script WMS KMZ Google Earth vorticity information from ECMWF reanalysis Can check situating of tempest tracks and view impact of tempests on sea (e.g. cooling of ocean surface as Katrina passes)

Slide 17

Ocean surface cools as Katrina passes

Slide 18

Conclusions Combining and envisioning dissimilar geospatial datasets is turning out to be ever simpler Relies on norms consistence Data arrange (e.g. NetCDF) Metadata traditions (e.g CF) Service interfaces (WMS, WCS, WFS and so forth) Two levels of information get to: Quick look (WMS, KML, GeoRSS) – simple yet constrained Full get to (WCS, WFS) – harder yet wealthier Standards still in flux yet now is a decent time to participate!