Forestalling Medicare Fraud among Health Providers and Organizations:

1894 days ago, 599 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Avoiding Medicare Fraud among Health Providers and Organizations: (Part I): An Overview for Senior Medicare Patrols of Schemes, Scams, and Interventions with Health Organizations and Providers This presentation was supported to some degree by a give from the US Administration on Aging. Grantees are urged to unreservedly express their discoveries, along these lines, materials and feelings don't speak to the position or strategy of the US Administration on Aging.

Slide 2

Presenters Dr. Stamp Gray Professor and Executive Director Iowa Center on Immigrant Leadership and Integration University of Northern Iowa Dr. Michele Yehieli Associate Professor and Executive Director Iowa EXPORT Center of Excellence on Health Disparities University of Northern Iowa

Slide 3

Outline of Topics Background on Research Overview of the Extent of Medicare Fraud Defining Fraud and Abuse Contributing Factors to Fraud and Abuse Common Forms of Medicare Fraud Affecting Health Agencies and Providers Strategies for Providers to Prevent Fraud Conclusion

Slide 4

Background on Research Literature audit: Types of extortion, minorities/settlers and misrepresentation, and so on. Interviews with FBI, OIG, NHIC, Attorney General authorities, and other law authorization specialists Tours of misrepresentation common neighborhoods Urban and provincial situations

Slide 5

Overview of the Extent of Medicare Fraud More than 1 billion yearly cases prepared across the country through Medicare $1 out of each $10 of Medicare expenses are assessed to be deceitful; can differ drastically from 1% to more than 30%, contingent upon area 2006 gauge: $19 billion lost to extortion, blunder, and manhandle Fraudulent cases soaring crazy

Slide 6

Defining Fraud and Abuse Fraud: To deliberately charge for administrations that were never offered or to charge for an administration that has a higher repayment than the administration delivered. Think deception. Manhandle: Payment for things or administrations that are charged by error by suppliers, however ought not be paid for by Medicare. This is not the same as extortion.

Slide 7

Beyond the Numbers… . A framework "ready for loot" Why do individuals swindle Medicare? Misrepresentation is simple Getting got is uncommon Prosecution is even rarer In So. California: < 1% is alluded to law implementation

Slide 8

A Huge System 40 million recipients 1 million suppliers A Complex System Multiple layers of administration Different directions

Slide 9

Medicare has numerous "moving parts." Organizational Structure Policies and Regulations Contractors Operations

Slide 10

Congress makes Health & Human Services as a component of the Executive Branch Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS; Baltimore) HHS OIG Federal Employees CMS Regional Offices ALJ framework Medicare Central Office (CO) MEDICARE PART B (NHIC) Fee For Service (80% of Part B) Contractors MEDICARE PART A Hospitals & Institutions; Renal Benefits MEDICARE DME Durable Medical Equipm. Top (Competitive Acquisition Program; Delivery of office medications) MEDICARE PART D Drug Benefit MEDICARE Managed Care (PART C) Medicare Advantage (Formerly Medical +Choice) QIO Quality Improvement Organization (CA = Lumetra) OIG PSC "Program Security Contractors" (Fraud) FBI QIC (Quality Contractors – Appeals) DOJ RAC (Recovery Audit Contractors – Demo Project CA FL NY) Medicare has a mind boggling association.

Slide 11

Medicare has different levels of directions. Congress US Code (Social Security Act, SSA Title XVIII, Health) CMS National Coverage Decisions (NCD) Agency Rulings Code of Fed Reg CFR Medicare Program Manuals Carrier Local Coverage Decisions (LCD) Local open remark Local counseling board Policies (LCD) Articles "A LCD is fundamentally a program trustworthiness device." CMS, 66FR58803, 11/23/01 Internal Guides

Slide 12

A Huge System Patients and suppliers confront variable and conflicting strategy elucidations from different temporary workers and from various workplaces with covering purviews inside the government itself. Guidelines may differ crosswise over regions and after some time. Suppliers looking for specialized help from Medicare are regularly baffled in light of the fact that their inquiries go unanswered.

Slide 13

A Huge System A close consistent stream of confounded controls and program changes Medicare directions "ambiguous" and "indistinct" Sometimes Medicare workplaces differ if something is "extortion" Sometimes Medicare staff (accidentally) train suppliers on the best way to "up code"

Slide 14

Base Problem… Medicare misrepresentation is "non-self-uncovering" With Mastercards Itemized proclamation Customer pays with his/her assets If there is an inconsistency, it is in the client's self-enthusiasm to challenge the accuse Of Medicare, the client/persistent never observes the charge it is paid by the administration Only once in a while will understanding catch deceitful charges on possess explanation afterward

Slide 15

Base Problem… Fraud = charging for invented administrations or for administrations of insignificant or no esteem to quiet (eg. pointless lab tests) Limited co-installments evacuate persistent motivating forces to pay consideration on the bill or "patients" are paid for their support Fraud comes about because of isolating payer from the beneficiary of administrations Patient can just catch misrepresentation after it happens

Slide 16

Seven Factors that Make Fraud Control Difficult * Non-self uncovering offenses Performance markers are, best case scenario vague; even under the least favorable conditions unreasonable and deceiving More recognized extortion can mean enhanced method for identification or extortion has expanded Success in indictment can be seen as disappointments in counteractive action *(National Institute of Justice, Malcolm Sparrow 1998: "Misrepresentation Control in the Health Care Industry")

Slide 17

Seven Factors that Make Fraud Control Difficult Fraud control vies for assets against profitability and administration "… the least expensive approach to handle a claim is to pay it." Fraud control is changing: a diversion against adversaries who are typically one stage ahead.

Slide 18

Seven Factors that Make Fraud Control Difficult Too much accentuation on customary implementation approaches Difference between examination (instrument) and control (the objective) Effectiveness of new extortion controls "routinely overestimated" Ever evolving rivals/tricks

Slide 19

Seven Factors that Make Fraud Control Difficult Fraud control endeavors mirror the generation environment in which they work Dynamic adversaries versus static channels Fraud plans are planned so that exchanges easily fit a genuine profile and go through unchallenged Medicare benefit codes & electronic handling are confused, with dialect and organization all their own

Slide 20

Public Opinion Does Not Help To exacerbate matters: 2 in 3 Americans endure protection misrepresentation to shifting degrees 2 in 5 Americans need next to zero discipline for protection cheats; they accuse the protection business since they "trust safety net providers are unfair."* Fraud and waste not generally saw to by and by influence patients or citizens Similar perspectives about Medicare???? *Coalition Against Insurance Fraud

Slide 21

Types of Fraud Billing for administrations never rendered Using real patient data to manufacture claims or "cushion" claims for strategies that never occurred Billing for more costly administrations than were really given "upcoding" Billing for higher-evaluated treatment than was really given Billing to doctor mind when lower-level supplier really went to

Slide 22

Types of Fraud 3. Giving therapeutically superfluous administrations or items exclusively to produce protection installments Rent-a-patient tricks "sweaty palm disorder" sham facilities durable restorative hardware tricks enlist and pay patients to have pointless surgery skeleton drug stores

Slide 23

Types of Fraud 4. Distorting non-secured medications as medicinally fundamental generally restorative surgery plans, for example, "nose employments," "tummy tucks," and liposuction But charged as digressed septum repairs, hernia repairs, lumpectomies, and so on

Slide 24

Fraudulent Billing: It's all in the codes All Medicare strategies have a code 1,000s of codes Providers are repaid X dollars for every code submitted Millions of electronic claims every year Tiny rate examined Computers may get "atypical" codes (if customized to do as such)

Slide 25

SoCal was "assaulted" by abnormal administrations starting in 2003/2004. 91122 Anal Manometry 2003 2004 SoCal was "assaulted" by abnormal administrations starting in 2003/2004. Administrations for 91122, Anal Manometry, swelled in 2003. There was no nearby farthest point on this code/benefit per understanding. All administrations were in Southern California. NCA = $500,000 SCA = $40,000,000

Slide 26

The Code Game What is butt-centric manometry? A test performed to assess patients with clogging or fecal incontinence. This test measures the weights of the butt-centric sphincter muscles, the sensation in the rectum, and the neural reflexes that are required for typical solid discharges.

Slide 27

The Code Game Why were such a large number of more individuals getting butt-centric manometry? "restoratively unfathomable care" Few patients experienced strategy Majority didn't: their names and Medicare numbers were utilized for fake charging as a part of sham centers Recruited in ethnic squeeze: Recruit Medicare or Medicaid patients just No private protection/private pay "Doc-in-a-case" Crime syndicates

Slide 28

"Therapeutically vital… " "medicinally mind blowing" Vs. "restoratively essential… " But how to differentiate? Requires review of patient records (however how review a great many documents?) Only 2,000 irregular case audits in every state every year Anomalous Codes

Slide 29

$600M/Yr PULM $24 PT $182M U/S $25 MISC $26 VESTIB $27 SKIN $27 VASC $65 UROL $43 LAB $55 ALL $58 Most atypical administrations are indicative tests. Irregular codes were characterized as 3X usage and >$1M abundance spending. Crude information: in light of 1H 2005 yet ann