Fingerprinting and Markers for Floral Crop Improvement

Presentation Transcript

Fingerprinting and Markers for Floral Crop Improvement James W. Moyer Dept. of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695

Introduction Floral industry has encountered huge development Industry generation Introduction of new items Cultivars of existing yields New species Rapid extension brings new issues Breeder's rights Grower trust in cultivar personality Improved plant quality Disease and creepy crawly resistance Heat and dry season resilience Longer time span of usability

DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Markers DNA fingerprinting is a helpful apparatus in botanical harvest hereditary qualities Cultivar recognizable proof Maintenance of rearing lines Protecting raisers' rights Molecular markers can encourage the ID and introgression of qualities for cultivar change Methods for creating hereditary markers include: AFLP SSR Retrotransposons

Objectives Identify and organize monetarily essential harvests Survey the business Develop center devices for need crops Research accessible innovations Select a strategy and build up a methodology Generate polymorphisms valuable for fingerprinting or other marker helped reproducing applications Develop high-throughput advancements for effective preparing

Survey Prioritizing a rundown of harvests as per: Breeding exertion: could bolster improvement and utilization of atomic devices Competitiveness: would profit by fingerprinting for licensing and observing of permit understandings Responses: Highest need yields are chrysanthemum, petunia, geranium, carnation, and New Guinea Impatiens

Crop Values Value x $1000 Top ten: Other high need crops: New Guinea Impatiens was 11 th at 75,219,000 Carnation was 27 th at 6,430,000

AFLP Fingerprinting Used to create sub-atomic markers for fingerprinting without earlier learning of the genome Successful for poinsettia and NGI Databases made for both harvests Progressed from manual radioactive strategies (above) to semi-computerized fluorescent methods (underneath) F-AFLP used for hereditary investigation in a few plant animal varieties Barley, wheat, and azalea

F-AFLP Fingerprinting Advantages of fluorescent-based strategies over customary AFLP: Fluorescent name replaces the radioactive name, making this strategy more secure and less costly Scoring is more exact and more reproducible Better partition of sections on the gel Internal size standard present in each path Fragment scoring depends on a numerical representation of the piece force Compared to traditional 33P-named AFLP, this procedure: Increased the quantity of discernible parts Showed higher determination of enhancement items Made scoring quicker and more goal

Fingerprinting in Poinsettia database: 117 cultivars 41 AFLP sections Successfully recognizes most cultivars Multiple plants from delegate cultivars utilized for approval thinks about Plants from a similar reproducing family group together Color games bunch together as a similar cultivar

Fingerprinting in NGI database: 168 cultivars 95 AFLP parts Successfully recognizes cultivars Samples gathered from various raisers Duplicate examples utilized for approval concentrates Always bunch together Larger number of parts utilized as a part of request to represent hereditary variety

AFLP Fingerprinting Disadvantages: Technology is licensed Many polymorphisms might be expected to recognize firmly related cultivars or cultivars with more elevated amounts of hereditary variety (40 – 80 sections)

Microsatellites (SSRs) Genetic markers utilized for genotype ID and marker-helped rearing in an extensive variety of products including: Non-flower crops Soybean, rice, Macintosh, pine, mango, cotton Floral harvests Chrysanthemum, Dianthus Fewer amazing markers are expected to separate genotypes System is licensed however licensable, and could be utilized on a bigger scale than AFLP innovation

SSR Strategies Database mining Library advancement Library screening Hybridization PCR High throughput sequencing

Strategy 1: Library Screening and PCR Genomic DNA from poinsettia was incompletely processed with a confinement protein to create ~1200bp parts Fragments were ligated to a plasmid vector and changed to make a library The library was screened by PCR utilizing groundworks integral to the dreary arrangement with vector preliminaries PCR constructive preliminaries were sequenced and broke down

SSR Results: Strategy 1 Number of plates sequenced = 3 Number of rehashes distinguished = 233 Number of polymorphic rehashes = 1 Change methodologies to cover a greater amount of the genome and recognize more potential markers

Strategy 2: Library Sequencing Partially process genomic DNA to create 1200bp parts Ligate pieces into a plasmid vector to make a library Use high-throughput strategies to succession the library, and along these lines a greater amount of the poinsettia genome Plate has 96 wells: 700bp for every well = 67200bp for every plate Literature demonstrates that one SSR will be available each 6000bp Could hypothetically distinguish 11 SSRs per sequencing plate

SSR Results: Strategy 2 Number of rehashes distinguished to date = 636 The bigger rehash groupings will be dissected for conceivable polymorphism Additional provinces will be sequenced to distinguish extra microsatellites

Typical Retrotransposon: Pol 300 bp LTR Gag PR INT RT RNASE H RNASE H LTR 5' 5' 3' 3' 300 bp 300 bp 300 bp 300 bp Retrotransposons Identified in: Poinsettia ( 11 cultivars) Chrysanthemum (1 cultivar) African violet ( 2 cultivars) Petunia (1 cultivar) Reverse Transcriptase Gene:

Retrotransposon Application

Eckespoint Pink Peppermint Sonora Jingle Bells Freedom Marble Winter Rose Freedom Jingle Bells Eckespoint Jingle Bells Petunia Pink African Violet Peterstar Jingle Bells Petunia Purple African Violet Coral Davis Mum Coral Davis Mum Coral Davis Mum Coral Davis Mum Petunia Pink African Violet Purple African Violet Eckespoint Jingle Bells Eckespoint Pink Peppermint Peterstar Jingle Bells Sonora Jingle Bells Freedom Marble Winter Rose Retrotransposon Analysis

Summary Accomplishments Fluorescent advances were adjusted for use with microsatellite markers Input was gathered from the business and imperative harvests were recognized Strategies for discovering SSR markers were created Methods as of now being tried and refined on poinsettia Techniques will be connected to other botanical harvests Designed methodologies for finding retrotransposons Tested in a few products Implemented high-throughput techniques DNA extraction from cloning tests Examine probability of multiplexing fluorescent SSR groundworks in future examinations