Extraordinary Herbivore Species Grazing Effect On Plant Life

0
0
1769 days ago, 694 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Presentation. . A group is all related species inside of a given region. An assortment of variables act to structure groups

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Extraordinary Herbivore Species Grazing Effect On Plant Life Module 5 SEE-U 2001 Biosphere 2 Center, AZ Yuko Chitani Mei Ying Lai Lily Liew Asma Madad Adam Nix Eli Pristoop J.C. Sylvan Prof. Tim Kittel, TA Erika Geiger

Slide 2

Introduction A people group is altogether related species inside a given region. An assortment of elements act to structure groups — figures as shifted as climate changes and cataclysmic events, to outlandish species presentations, to the characteristic strain amongst makers and purchasers. Regardless of whether the plant is slaughtered, be that as it may, herbivory can possibly drastically modify plant and creature groups. In this review the current question was, how touching impacts a group? What is the impact of herbivory on plant group differing qualities and species wealth? It is critical to discover the impacts that cows eating has on sonoran betray arrive. Understanding the working of groups is basic to save jeopardized environments and the species in that. The best way to aggregate information on this is to gauge the percent of vegetation structures.

Slide 3

Site Locations

Slide 4

Methods Three distinct locales were spoken to the differing force of herbivory on plant groups: territory 1 experienced practically no nibbling by dairy cattle. Region 2, which was fenced off, experienced direct nibbling by cows; 64 head of cows went this region for a time of 3 months before this review. Territory 3, likewise fenced off, was exceptionally used by neighboring farmers as rangeland. Perception showed that this region had encountered a high power of cows eating. The line capture testing was utilized to decide the airborne front of species (as oppsed to basal cover) on a 50-meter line inside the three locales. The separation of the line to the fence of each individual site was likewise recorded. The line was then isolated into 10-meter segments. Working in sets, we distinguished each meeting species and their scope.

Slide 5

Sample packs were named with: site, area on the 10-meter segments from which it was gathered, specie name, and lifeform . 6 GPS readings were taken at the three destinations, toward the start and end of the line. The information was then put into Excel. We chose four different species that were illustrative of the adjustments in the percent cover over the three zones: Boraginaceae Family #1, Calliandra eriophylla, Hilaria belangeri, Opuntia engelmanni Absolute percent cover measures the specie's extent in regard to the length of the line tested (50m). Relative percent cover measures the specie's extent in regard to the aggregate length of all species inspected (>50m).

Slide 6

Plant Lifeform Classification Sarcostemma cynanchoides sp. Hartwegii , a vine, was named a perpetual forb.

Slide 7

RESULTS 1) Plant scope: Area 1 (ungrazed) > Area 2 (modestly brushed) > Area 3 (vigorously touched). The percent scope of yearly forbs dropped from 55% relative scope in Area 1 to 52% in Area 2 to just 14% in Area 3 (see fig. 1, 2, 3). 2) As aggregate plant scope reduced, relative and total % values accomplished equality (see fig. 3). 3) Overall uncovered ground expanded from Area 1< 2 < 3 (see fig. 4, 9). 4) Four species speak to the adjustments in the percent cover over the three regions: Boraginaceae Family #1, Calliandra eriophylla, Hilaria belangeri, Opuntia engelmanni. While a few animal categories showed a decline in percent cover, others tended to increment (e.g. succulents increments from Area 1 (9.2%) to Area 2 (16.5%) and Area 3 (24.2%)) (see fig. 9). 5) Species differing qualities stays steady more than three ranges (see fig. 10). 6) Lifeform differing qualities additionally stays consistent more than three zones (see fig. 10).

Slide 8

Fig. 1

Slide 9

Fig. 2

Slide 10

Fig. 3

Slide 11

Fig. 4

Slide 12

Fig. 5

Slide 13

Fig. 6

Slide 14

Fig. 7

Slide 15

Fig. 8

Slide 16

Fig. 9

Slide 17

Fig. 10

Slide 18

Hilaria belangeri Lepidium lasiocarpum Leptochloa dubia = Species B Lupinus concinnus(?) Machaeranthera tagetina Microseris linearifolia = Species D Opuntia chlorotica Opuntia engelmanni Opuntia phaeacantha Opuntia spinosior Plantago patagonica Prosopis velutina = Mesquite Sarcostemma cynanchoides ssp. Hartwegii Sisymbrium irio L. Tridens muticus = Species J2 Triodanis perfoliata = Species J1 Viguiera longifolia = Species F Species I BARE GROUND DUNG LITTER Plant Species Found at Sites Acacia greggii Ambrosia confertiflora Androsace occidentalis Aristida ternipes var. gentilis Boraginaceae Family #1 Boraginaceae Family #2 = Species K Boraginaceae Family #3 Bothriochloa barbinodis Bouteloua curtipenbula Bouteloua hirsuta Bromus rubens Calliandra eriophylla Chenopodium sp. Daucus pusillus = Species H Descurainia pinnata = Species E Echinocereus Elymus elymoides Eragrostis curvula Eragrostis intermedia Erigeron divergens = Species An Eriogonum wrightii Gilia sp. Gnaphalium

Slide 19

Discussion How Does Grazing Affect Plant Community Diversity and Species Abundance? To answer this question, we concentrated three unique destinations: Area 1 an ungrazed extend, Area 2 a decently brushed range, and Area 3 a vigorously touched open range. From general perception, unmistakably the intensely touched site had minimal wealth of plants and a considerable measure of uncovered ground between markings. It likewise required us extensively less investment to test the vigorously touched site than it accomplished for the other two locales. We gauged the plant group's general lavishness of species by breaking down the quantity of species found and gathered in each of the three ranges. The conceivable wellsprings of blunder include: misidentification of plants, irregularity and incorrectness in measuring procedure, vulnerability in whether the lines tested were illustrative of the distinctive ranges.

Slide 20

Conclusion Intense herbivory affects the lifeform organization of the plant group. Notwithstanding, herbivory does not really influence the biodiversity of the group. In this activity we learned: Plant ID and characterization Relative and total percent inclusions

Slide 21

References Epple, Anne Orth. A Field Guide to the Plants of Arizona . Lew Ann Publishing Company, Mesa, Arizona. 1995. Gould, Frank W. Grasses of the Southwestern United States. College of Arizona Press, Tucson. 1993. Kearney, Thomas H. what's more, Peebles, Robert H. Arizona Flora . College of California Press, Berkeley. 1960. Niehaus, Theodore F. A Field Guide to Southwestern and Texas Wildflowers . Houghton Mifflin Co., New York. 1984. Robbins, Travis, David Lancaster, Janna Lancaster and Dr. Tony Burgess. Biosphere 2 Center Plant Field Guide . (Unpublished). On account of Tim and Erika for their aptitude in plant distinguishing proof.

SPONSORS