Definitions Methodological Options to Inventory Emissions from Direct Human-Induced Degradation of Forests Devegetatio

2533 days ago, 913 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Definitions and Methodological Choices to Stock Outflows from Direct Human-Actuated Debasement of Backwoods and Devegetation of Other Vegetation Sorts. Co-ordinating Lead Creators

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Definitions & Methodological Options to Inventory Emissions from Direct Human-Induced Degradation of Forests & Devegetation of Other Vegetation Types Co-ordinating Lead Authors Tomas Hernandez (Mexico), Samuel Kainja (Malawi), Timo Karjalainen (Finland), Gerald Lawson (UK), Shirong Liu (China), Steve Prisley (US), Gary Richards (Australia) Lead Authors Juan Ivar Arana Pardo (Bolivia), Richard Birdsey (US), Marie Boehm (Canada), Julius Daka (Zambia), Shigeo Kobayashi (Japan), Gyde Lund (US), Roman Michalak (Poland), Robert Scholes (South Africa), Masamichi Takahashi (Japan)

Slide 2

Responds to the SBSTA Invitiation To create definitions for direct human-prompted " debasement " of timberlands and " devegetation " of other vegetation sorts and methodological alternatives to stock and investigate emanations coming about because of these exercises,… Task 2

Slide 3

Terms of Reference asked for definitions for corruption of backwoods & devegetation of other vegetation sorts; methodological choices to stock discharges from direct human-actuated corruption & devegetation exercises; ways to deal with revealing & documentation; exchange of ramifications of methodological choices re. the arrangements of Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol (counting issues of scale, expenses and precision). Assignment 2

Slide 4

The report is sorted out as: Chapter 1 Overview : - presentation, setting, structure and arrangement pertinence Chapter 2 Definitions of Forest Degradation and Devegetation, and Scale of Direct Human Influences Upon Them: - characterizes and portrays corruption of timberlands and devegetation of other vegetation sorts and gives cases of potential direct human-incited exercises Task 2

Slide 5

proceeded with Chapter 3 Methodological Options for Estimating Emissions from Forest Degradation and Devegetation: - gives ways to deal with recognizable proof of pertinent land regions to gauge carbon stock changes and non-CO2 outflows, and furthermore gives revealing tables Chapter 4 Implications of Methodological Options to Accounting under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol : - talks about conditions in which LULUCF bookkeeping and announcing could be lopsided and how the proposed representing backwoods debasement and devegetation may address this, the expenses of bookkeeping and the potential size of any uneven bookkeeping Task 2

Slide 6

Consultation: first request draft Purpose of the report Reinforced that thought of debasement and devegetation are with regards to Kyoto Protocol bookkeeping Report ought to manage Kyoto Protocol bookkeeping Reporting class eg under Art 3.3, 3.4 or somewhere else is a strategy assurance past this report Suggested presentations of agradation and avegetation are past TOR Should consider just direct human prompted exercises according to TOR Definitions for debasement and devegetation Sought definition choices for corruption and devegetation Task 2

Slide 7

proceeded with Linkage to GPG report Task 2 report alludes to GPG report where important Policy-prescriptive substance Avoids reference to bookkeeping approaches eg net-net Degradation alludes to woodland lands just – Harvested Wood Products produced past TOR (other SBSTA forms) Redrafting content keeps up an impartial tone Readability and understandability Progressively a ddressed in refining content Focus on down to earth application/depictions Task 2

Slide 8

proceeded with Recommended definitions Forest Degradation The abuse or poor administration of backwoods that prompts to a long haul diminishment in (biomass thickness) carbon stocks Devegetation of other vegetation sorts The coordinate human-actuated transformation of other vegetated land to non-vegetated arrive Task 2

Slide 9

proceeded with Tables portray forms that may prompt to woodland debasement or devegetation of other vegetation sorts Methodological choices to stock emanations and expulsions from woodland corruption and devegetation are to a great extent given in the GPG-LULUCF Little direction on the size of either timberland corruption or devegetation can be given Task 2

Slide 10

Findings to date backwoods corruption to consider if potential "unequal" bookkeeping might be made because of the race/non-race of exercises under Article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol, taking note of pertinent just to Annex I Parties Annex I Parties for the most part report the general supportability of woodland administration on a national scale Annex I Parties for the most part have Forest Codes of Practice for manageability no comparable global detailing system applies to devegetation no sign of the scale or degree of action, however the net-net approach for revealing discharges and evacuations connected to revegetation (and probably to devegetation ) limits the potential for critical outflows to be reportable at a national scale Task 2

Slide 11

Conclusions to date Concerning woodland administration : if woodland administration is chosen then all outflows and evacuations on significant land will be accounted for balancedly; for zones of backwoods excluded as woods administration , no discharges or evacuations are accounted for. A net discharge or evacuation may happen, however this won't impact the adjusted detailing of land drawn into the bookkeeping structure; if woods administration is not chosen then no outflows and expulsions are accounted for (outside of those revealed under Article 3.3) and adjusted announcing is accomplished; with race or non-race of woodland administration , adjusted detailing dependably happen for grounds inside the bookkeeping system; emanations or evacuations may happen outside the bookkeeping structure and this is totally predictable with the intentional decision of Article 3.4 exercises. Undertaking 2

Slide 12

Conclusions to date Concerning devegetation : if revegetation is not chosen then no emanations or expulsions related with such action are accounted for and revealing is adjusted; if revegetation is chosen then all outflows and expulsions from pertinent land units are accounted for balancedly; as the incorporation of terrains depends on "direct human-instigated action that expands carbon stock" the detailing might be affected towards evacuations; if devegetation announcing parallels revegetation announcing action that declines carbon stock will impact revealing towards discharges; the obligatory acquaintance of devegetation in parallel with revegetation (else it is probably not going to be chosen) the potential nursery gas related impetuses to take part in revegetation (rebuilding, recovery) exercises are probably going to be hindered. Assignment 2

Slide 13

Thank you Task 2