Customary Views on the Family's Function

0
0
1724 days ago, 540 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Social Trends : Marriage

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

´╗┐Customary Views on the Function of the Family The 'ideal Kelloggs family' and the terrible "Simpsons" make them thing in like manner; they speak to the main utilitarian answer for tyke raising.

Slide 2

Social Trends : Marriage & Divorce after the 1969 Act Divorce rate p/1000: 1961-2, 1971-6, 1990-13 Divorces for every year have multiplied 40% of relational unions fizzle, 75% including kids Marriage rate p/1000 has split Re-Marriage rate p/1000 has fallen Cohabitation has multiplied (30% of twenty-year-olds) Births to unmarried mums up from 8% > 30% 1998 44,000 pregnancies 16-18, 8000 under 16 (3% of every unmarried mum are youngsters)

Slide 3

Social Trends: Marriage, Divorce & Remarriage

Slide 5

General Household Survey 1 Single Parenthood 2002/3 1961 2% of family units SP > 2002 8% SP 1972 7% of kids had SP > 2002 21% SP 2003 25% of families + subordinate children = SP 88% of children with a SP live with their mum. Single Parent Mothers in 2003: 45% = unmarried mum [ a major increment since 1972] 32% = separated mum 18% = isolated solitary mum 5% = widowed solitary mother

Slide 6

General Household Survey 2 Single Parenthood 2002/3 15% of SP's quit being solitary guardians every year and set up home with another accomplice. 55% of SP are on Income Support, contrasted with 4% of couples with ward kids. 61% of solitary parent families are said to be underneath the destitution line. In spite of the CSA, 70% of non-occupant guardians connected to a SP, made no commitment towards the cost of bringing up their kids: either in light of the fact that they had betrayed the family or on the grounds that they were themselves unemployed or on low earnings.

Slide 7

British Social Attitudes Survey: Single Parenthood 2000 Of 75-85 yr olds, 90% thought individuals who needed youngsters ought to get hitched, yet just 30% of those under 25 concurred with this. 82% of individuals disliked high schooler pregnancies. 83% thought raising a youngster all alone was too hard for a solitary adolescent. 42% thought raising a youngster all alone was too hard for a solitary lady. Not very many ill-conceived births are arranged > single parenthood is not seen as attractive, by numerous. Most single guardians had sought after an accomplice.

Slide 8

Traditional perspectives on the capacity of the Family The Kelloggs or Simpsons Family is seen by Functionalists as a Universal Solution to the issue of bringing up and mingling Human youngsters Nuclear Families have adjusted to address the issues of post-Industrial Societies The New Right considers the "assorted qualities" of present day families a risk to our lifestyle.

Slide 9

Murdock: Social Structure 1949 Family is a Universal Solution to the need to secure and mingle youngsters The Family is an essential monetary unit The Nuclear Family is the result of industrialisation, since social orders require a portable work constrain This is a Functionalist & Structuralist see that expect individuals are formed by Society

Slide 10

Talcott Parsons: The Social System 1951 The Family mingles kids and balances out (backings) the identities of the grown-ups, giving request and intending to their lives: the 'steaming shower'. As social orders turn out to be more intricate, so individuals have some expertise in various parts. Sex parts are specific: ladies support the kids (Expressive), men give (Instrumental) This is Functionalist, additionally utilizes the Sociobiological contention that the Nuclear Family (Patriarchal in frame) is by one means or another "normal"

Slide 11

Talcott Parsons: Socialization & Interaction 1955 Industrialisation and urbanization created a change from Nuclear to Extended families A portable work constrain was required Family no longer characterized status/class: individuals could "enhance" themselves = social portability Kinship declined in significance likewise in light of the fact that experts supplanted kinfolk, in giving help: in affliction, unemployment, for childcare or for training.

Slide 12

Berger: Marriage & social development of reality 1964 The importance of "Family" is built from the implications that social on-screen characters provide for their cooperations with other social individuals Actors utilize the Family to understand their reality; this is fundamental for maintaining a strategic distance from anomie (sentiment not having a place) or estrangement (sentiment not having a stake in Society) Families give a feeling of having duties and rules (standards) for conduct

Slide 13

Berger: War over the Family 1983 Supported the New Right move to safeguard 'Family Values' and conventional ethical quality Attacked communist, aggregate, ways to deal with youngster raising as a disappointment (Soviet) or as overstated (Kibbutz) Children's homes were the most exceedingly terrible approach to raise kids: abuse,crime,drugs and so on. Family is ideal, don't thump it

Slide 14

Mount: The Subversive Family 1982 New Right/Functionalist see that the Family is a social foundation that works, since it fits in with human instinct. This is the Familial belief system. Looking after youngsters is the obligation and predetermination of ladies; ladies shouldn't be made to feel second rate since they be homemakers Diversity, separation and ladies' freedom are spreads for another childishness & corruption Dysfunctional families debilitate Society

Slide 15

Abbot & Wallace 1992: The New Right & the Family 1980's response against assorted qualities, high tax collection and youth wrongdoing: Pro-Family, Pro-Life, Catholic, Conventional,C.of E,, Evangelical, Conservative, Muslim, Fundamentalist, UK [Mrs Thatcher 1979-90 & USA [President Reagan 1981-1989]. Work's communist approaches were purposely undermining the family: high charges constrained more moms to work, government managed savings installments to single parents urged useless families to bring up useless youngsters, homosexuality had been empowered & legitimized, moral obligation regarding nurturing one's kids had been supplanted by an 'abandon it to the State' disposition.

Slide 16

Lister 1996: Back to the Family John Major [1990-1997] carried on the Thatcher way to deal with the Family, until destroyed by outrage. A Family serve, brought up Child advantage, Child Support Agency, Adoption favored wedded couples over accomplices or gays, 'Simple crusade to reestablish family values, feedback of solitary moms as untrustworthy scroungers, The Children's Act 1989 & the Family Law Act 1996 rejected the 'total separation' perfect for separations. Rather it was assumed that separation was an issue for kids & that both guardians ought to in any case share the majority of the duty regarding raising them.

Slide 17

Silva & Smart 1999: The New Practices & Policies of Family Life 1 Silva & Smart contend that Blair's New Labor [1997>] have proceeded with the accentuation on family values & empowering ordinary family life. Blair contends that family life is the establishment of society. The legislature is not lecturing about individual profound quality, but rather just tending to a noteworthy reason for social issues: IE the impact of separation on kids, adolescent pregnancies, absence of look after the elderly, poor parental good examples, truancy, underachievement in school and a summed up misery in Society.

Slide 18

Silva & Smart 1999: The New Practices & Policies of Family Life 2 1998 the Supporting Families Green Paper and The National Family & Parenting Institute were expected to give better data & administrations for families. Pundits call attention to that Blair implies an admired customary family, similar to the ideal 'first family' of Tony and Cherie. It has proposed that: wellbeing guests ought to be more included; recorders ought to give directing before marriage; additionally advising before separation; longer paid maternity leave; help with childcare costs for solitary mums [The New Deal] & low-salary families [ Working Families Tax Credits] ; pre-marital understandings official.

Slide 19

John Redwood: Conservative Minister under Thatcher 1 Too numerous broken families : of 1m+ single parent families 55% were on advantages. 70% of solitary guardians got no support from the father, who left things to the State > Child Support Agency made to discover fathers. Young ladies got pregnant to bounce the lodging lines and keep away from work People gave pardons for their terrible conduct, yet the poor were regularly debased, not denied Single guardians were unnatural and harmed their youngsters > wrongdoing & disappointment at school.

Slide 20

John Redwood: Conservative Minister under Thatcher 2 The New Right asked the sound judgment see that solitary Parents couldn't give their kids enough time and that the youngsters must endure therefore. Mary McIntosh, in Social Anxieties about Lone Motherhood 1996 , reprimanded Redwood for respecting moral frenzies in the media. She denied that solitary guardians were useless guardians or that the ascent in SP families could be connected to higher truancy levels, youth wrongdoing, underachievement or young pregnancies. Prove for young ladies purposely getting pregnant with a specific end goal to dodge work & hop the lodging lines was extremely uncommon.

Slide 21

New Labor & The Welfare Dependency of Single Parents 1 Lone guardians, without considerable help from an ex-accomplice, are gotten in a neediness trap: childcare nearly meets their wage thus they can't work. Work don't formally acknowledge Murray's theory [that welfare installments are making an underclass of reliant, unemployed, government disability scrounger]. In any case, Most single guardians are on advantages, notwithstanding when in work. Just 44% of single parent moms are in paid work and large portions of those are low maintenance.

Slide 22

New Labor & The Welfare Dependency of Single Parents 2 Blair was affected by President Clinton & the Democratic Party in the USA, who intended to supplant welfare with workfare. It is affirmed, in Labor's 'Supporting Families' Green Paper 1998, that 85% of SP moms might want to get into all day work. Work's 'New D

SPONSORS