Composing Student Learning Outcomes

0
0
2089 days ago, 766 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Composing Student Learning Outcomes

Slide 2

What are PLOs, SLOs, and EEOs? PLO The Palestinian Liberation Organization? Program Leaning Outcomes! SLO The Symbionese Liberation Organization? Understudy Learning Outcomes! EEO Equal Employment Opportunity? Model Educational Objectives!

Slide 3

Alignment of Outcomes

Slide 4

What are Student Learning Outcomes? Formal explanations that expressive: The information , aptitudes/capacities , and properties we need our understudies to have the capacity to illustrate. From their learning encounters both curricular and co-curricular exercises. Destinations versus Results Process/Fluid

Slide 5

Characteristics of SLOs They ought to be: Based on PLOs Collaborative Learner focused Specific Action arranged Cognitively proper Behavioral Measurable Observable Understandable Achievable Realistic

Slide 6

Learning Outcomes Formula Verb Or Action Phrase Great Learning Outcomes + Why? = "In Order To" OR What understudies need to know? "Understudy recognizes, counsels and assesses reference books fitting to the point" Why do they have to know this? "find foundation data and measurements." "In Order To"

Slide 7

Importance of Verbs Bloom's Taxonomy Affective Domain This space incorporates the way in which we manage things inwardly, for example, emotions, values, gratefulness, enthusiasms, inspirations, and states of mind. Psychomotor Domain The psychomotor space incorporates physical development, coordination, and utilization of the engine ability regions. Improvement of these aptitudes requires hone and is measured as far as speed, exactness, separation, methodology, or procedures in execution. Subjective Domain The psychological space includes information and the improvement of scholarly aptitudes. This incorporates the review or acknowledgment of particular realities, procedural examples, and ideas that serve in the improvement of scholarly capacities and abilities. There are six noteworthy classes, which are recorded all together beneath, beginning from the least difficult conduct to the most perplexing. The classes can be considered as degrees of challenges.

Slide 8

Cognitive Domain Involves information and the advancement of scholarly abilities Hierarchy of destinations as indicated by psychological many-sided quality Higher-level targets incorporate, and are dependant on lower level intellectual aptitudes

Slide 9

Bloom's Taxonomy

Slide 10

Bloom's – Lower Levels Knowledge Recalling beforehand learned data, for example, actualities, phrasing, rules, and so on. Answers might be remembered or nearly reworded from appointed material. Characterize, list, name, review

Slide 11

Bloom's – Lower Levels Comprehension Ability to appreciate the significance of material. Answers must be in the understudy's own words while as yet utilizing phrasing proper to the course material. Clarify, compress, recognize, restate

Slide 12

Bloom's – Lower Levels Demonstrate repetition or surface learning Declarative or Procedural Knowledge Answers found in the allocated materials 80% of HS educators test at these levels

Slide 13

Bloom's – Higher Levels Application Requires perceiving, distinguishing, or applying an idea or standard in another circumstance or taking care of another issue. May require recognizing or producing cases not found in allocated materials. Illustrate, organize, relate, adjust

Slide 14

Bloom's – Higher Levels Analysis Ability to separate material into its segment parts and to comprehend its basic structure May oblige understudies to investigate or clarify how a case delineates a given idea or guideline. Oblige understudies to distinguish consistent blunders or to separate among truths, suppositions, suspicions, theories and determinations Expected to make connections between thoughts Differentiate, gauge, derive, chart

Slide 15

Bloom's – Higher Levels Synthesis Opposite of Analysis Ability to join parts to shape another entire; to blend an assortment of components into a unique and critical entirety. Deliver something remarkable or unique Solve some new issue exceptionally Combine, make, detail, build

Slide 16

Bloom's – Higher Levels Evaluation Ability to assess an aggregate circumstance, to judge the estimation of material for a specific reason, joining components of the various classifications furthermore esteem judgments in view of characterized, settled criteria. The most essential part of the answer is the defense and method of reasoning for the conclusion Judge, investigate, legitimize, segregate

Slide 17

Bloom's – Higher Levels Meaningful or profound learning Go past literary material in that they should be construed or extrapolated from the material in the relegated material. Understudies' innovativeness, inventiveness and basic supposing is required at larger amounts More bona fide than lower levels Thinking at this level will probably speak to sorts of exhibitions required in this present reality

Slide 18

Questions for Assessment What do you need the understudy to have the capacity to do? (Result) What does the understudy need to know keeping in mind the end goal to do this well? (Educational programs) What action will encourage the learning? (Teaching method) How will the understudy show the learning? (Evaluation) How will I know the understudy has done this well? (Criteria)

Slide 19

What do you need the understudy to have the capacity to do? This question requests that you build up the result. For Example: Student recognizes, counsels and assesses reference books fitting to the subject with a specific end goal to find foundation data and measurements.

Slide 20

Example 1 Students will name the three sorts of shake with a specific end goal to separate among the three. Understudies will investigate the attributes of the three sorts of rocks keeping in mind the end goal to separate among the three.

Slide 21

Example 2 Students will have the capacity to utilize Excel. Given an example dataset, understudies will utilize Excel to make a spreadsheet that consolidates straightforward scientific recipes.

Slide 22

Example 3 Students will break down worldwide political frameworks. Understudies will dissect twentieth century western majority rule governments and duties of natives in those vote based systems.

Slide 23

Example 4 Students will develop book references and in-content references utilizing discipline proper styles as a part of request to add to scholastic talk in their train. Build lists of sources and in-content references utilizing discipline suitable styles as a part of request to effectively trait others' work and thoughts.

Slide 24

Write a SLO What does the understudy need to know? Why do they have to know this?

Slide 25

What Do I Do With SLOs? Placed them in your Syllabus. Evaluation them as a major aspect of your course. Report the appraisal if fundamental. Utilize the data to enhance your class.

Slide 26

The Assessment Process: Plan-Do-Review 1. Build up objectives and missions For courses and projects 6. Utilize results to refine guideline (close the criticism circle) 2. Compose planned Student Learning Outcomes (SLO's) Student Learning 5. Assess appraisal comes about 3. Create method for appraisal and criteria for accomplishment for assessing SLO's 4. Fuse SLO's and evaluation undertakings into direction

Slide 27

Why Assess? Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Principles of Accreditation Core Requirement 2.5 The establishment takes part in progressing, coordinated, and organization wide research-based arranging and assessment forms that fuse a precise audit of projects and administrations that (an) outcomes in proceeding with change, and (b) exhibits that the foundation is successfully finishing its main goal. Complete Standard 3.3.1 The establishment distinguishes expected results for its instructive projects and its authoritative and instructive bolster administrations; surveys whether it accomplishes these results; and gives proof of change in light of investigation of those outcomes.

Slide 28

Why Assess? Enhances understudies' learning. Recognizes instructional, course, or task challenges. Enhances guideline by distinguishing what instructional modification may be required. Guarantees reviewing is intelligent of understudies' learning towards course destinations. Makes reviewing more precise and goal.

SPONSORS