Clinical Assessment of Behavior

0
0
2658 days ago, 769 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

Clinical Assessment of Behavior Bruce A. Bracken, Ph.D. The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA (USA) Babrac@wm.edu

Slide 2

Problem Statement To what degree are youngsters' and teenagers' sure (i.e., versatile) and negative (i.e., clinical) conduct appraisals an aftereffect of essential demographic conditions (e.g., age, sexual orientation, race/ethnicity)? Are youngsters' behavioral evaluations equivalently dependable as an aftereffect of these fundamental demographic conditions? What percent of the difference in kids' behavioral evaluations is connected with essential demographic conditions? What exactly degree do youngsters' behavioral appraisals contrast as a consequence of race/ethnicity and sex?

Slide 3

Method Students' practices were appraised by their moms or fathers amid the institutionalization of another conduct rating scale, Clinical Assessment of Behavior (Bracken & Keith, 2004). Understudies' sure and negative (i.e., clinical) practices were looked at straightforwardly (i.e., mean score examinations) and by implication (e.g., percent of fluctuation represented by demographic factors; interior consistency gauges)

Slide 4

Instrument Clinical Assessment of Behavior (CAB; Bracken & Keith, 2004). Outsider conduct rating scale finished by guardians and educators (Parent shape utilized as a part of this study) Appropriate for youngsters ages 2 - 18 years Assesses Clinical practices (Psychopathology, sociopathy, instructive exceptionalities) and Adaptive practices Used as triangulating component in multi-source, mult-instrument clinical appraisals

Slide 5

Triangulation: Multi-source, Multiple Context Assessment Other Sources - Direct Observation - Indirect Approaches (e.g., Projective Techniques) -Background Information Behavioral and Psychosocial Adjustment Self-Report - Self-idea - Sentence Completion Forms Third-Party Report - CAB Parent or Teacher - BASC, DSMD, SSRS Achenbach, Connors

Slide 6

CAB Assesses: Critical Behaviors: low-frequency practices that characterize genuine psychopathology and sociopathy Psychotic encounters (e.g., mind flights) Substance mishandle Satanic love Gang-related practices Behaviors displayed in restorative and neuropsychological conditions Attention-deficiency/hyperactivity issue Learning incapacities Executive capacity qualities and constraints Autistic range practices

Slide 7

CAB Assesses: Behaviors that compare to instructive exceptionalities and conditions Mental impediment Learning inabilities Gifted and capable Adaptive practices Social aptitudes Behaviors of current societal concern Aggression Anger administration Bullying Conduct issues

Slide 8

Clinical Scales Internalizing Behaviors Scale (INT) Assesses practices coordinated toward self (e.g., misery, uneasiness, somatization, fear) - cries effortlessly; is effectively startled; is sincerely delicate Externalizing Behaviors Scale (EXT) Assesses tricky lead coordinated toward others (e.g., govern breaking practices, vandalism, truancy) - affronts others; is hard to oversee; disregards rules Critical Behaviors Scale (CRI) Assesses practices connected with genuine psychopathology and sociopathy - utilizes unlawful medications; fantasizes; communicates an unordinary enthusiasm for Satan

Slide 9

Adaptive Scales Social Skills Scale (SOC) Assesses interpersonal relations with associates and grown-ups - listens mindfully to others; is obliging of others; disturbs others Competence Scale (COM) Focuses on capacity to get needs met properly, learning, and intellectual and dialect advancement - has misguided thinking; is effectively confounded; adapts new things effectively Adaptive Behaviors Scale (ADB) Assesses formative advance and level of individual freedom - dresses self; dependably makes basic buys; plans basic dinners for self

Slide 10

CAB Scale Structure and Number of Items Scale CAB-PX CAB-P CAB-T Clinical Scales Internalizing 30 16 16 Externalizing 30 18 18 Critical Behaviors 30 - - - - Adaptive Scales Social Skills 30 18 18 Competence 30 18 18 Adaptive Behaviors 20 - - - - Total Scale 170 70 70

Slide 11

CAB Clusters and Number of Items Clusters CAB-PX CAB-P CAB-T Clinical Clusters Anxiety 23 11 11 Depression 36 16 16 Anger 15 9 9 Aggression 25 13 13 Bullying 36 13 13 Conduct Problems 28 8 8 Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity 21 20 20 Autistic Spectrum Behaviors 30 13 13 Learning Disability 23 15 15 Mental Retardation 25 12 12 Adaptive Clusters Executive Function 17 13 13 Gifted and Talented 27 17 17

Slide 12

Theoretical Structure of CAB

Slide 13

U.S. Regularizing Sample Size Males Females Total Parent Forms - ages 2 – 6 309 291 600 -ages 7 – 12 455 422 877 -ages 13 – 18 318 319 637 Teacher Form - ages 5 – 6 145 95 240 -ages 7 – 12 471 288 759 -ages 13 – 18 391 299 690 Race/Ethnicity (Percent Representation) Whites Blacks Hispanics Other 65 – 71% 12 – 17% 9 – 12% 6 – 8%

Slide 14

Normative Sample Education Level CAB-P CAB-T < 11 years 3.9% 3.2% 12 years 23.9% 2.5% 13 - 15 years 38.7% 11.4% 16 years 14.6% 17.5% > 17 years 18.8% 65.2% Unknown 0.1% 0.2% Geographic Region Midwest 21 – 25% 17 – 22% Northeast 13 – 22% 22 – 25% South 35 – 45% 36 – 39% West 19 – 22% 17 – 20%

Slide 15

CAB-PX Total Sample Internal Consistency

Slide 16

CAB PX Stability Scale CAB-PX Internalizing .89 Externalizing .90 Critical Behaviors .77 Social Skills .92 Competence .92 Adaptive Behaviors .87 CAB Behavioral Index .94 CAB Clusters .83 - .94

Slide 17

CAB Inter-rater Coefficients Scale CAB-PX* Internalizing .78 Externalizing .81 Critical Behaviors .41 Social Skills .62 Competence .79 Adaptive Behaviors .53 CAB Behavioral Index .82 CAB Clusters .70 - .90 * Parent - Parent

Slide 18

Analyses Estimates of aggregate scale inward consistency by race Estimates of percent scale fluctuation represented by essential demographic factors Scale and bunch mean score examinations for fundamental demographic factors

Slide 19

Comparative Reliabilities by Ethnic Group, Across Age Levels Caucasian African-American Hispanic Clinical Internalizing .94 - .95 .93 - .96 .91 - .96 Externalizing .96 - .97 .96 - .97 .93 - .98 Critical Behaviors .71 - .92 .80 - .98 .42 - .92 Adaptive Social Skills .92 - .96 .92 - .95 .89 - .96 Competence .91 - .95 .92 - .95 .89 - .97 Adaptive Behavior .79 - .89 .82 - .90 .84 - .89 Total Scale CBI .97 - .99 .98 - .99 .96 - .99 Clusters .84 - .97 .85 - .97 .78 - .97

Slide 20

Scale Variance Associated With Demographic Variables Age Gender Race Parent Ed Clinical Internalizing .35 .08 .59 .21 Externalizing .19 2.82 .01 .42 Clinical Behaviors 4.93 .53 .36 .72 Adaptive Social Skills 1.44 2.69 .03 .67 Competence 2.69 2.96 .01 .81 Adaptive Behaviors 49.70 1.80 .01 .03 Total Scale (CBI) 2.86 2.31 .01 .61

Slide 21

Cluster Variance Associated With Demographic Variables Age Gender Race Parent Ed Anxiety .00 .35 .26 .22 Depression .71 .40 .37 .29 Anger .79 2.07 .32 .45 Aggression 1.37 4.45 .10 .67 Bullying .49 2.34 .00 .58 Attention Deficit .90 3.84 .03 .42 Autistic Spectrum 5.15 1.72 .00 .61 Learning Disability .46 2.19 .00 .58 Mental Retardation 12.60 2.86 .04 .77 Executive Function 2.76 4.16 .00 .57 Gifted and Talented 3.10 3.46 .06 .94

Slide 22

Scales p Clusters p Anxiety (ANX) ns Internalizing Behaviors (INT) ns Depression (DEP) ns Externalizing Behaviors (EXT) ns Anger (ANG) ns Aggression (AGG) ns Critical Behaviors (CRI) ns Bullying (BUL) ns Conduct Problems (CP) ns Social Skills (SOC) ns Attention-Deficit (ADH) ns Competence (COM) ns Autistic Spectrum (AUT) ns Learning Disability (LD) ns Adaptive Behaviors (ADB) ns Mental Retardation (MR) ns Executive Function (EF) ns Total (CBI) ns Gifted and Talented (GAT) ns Gender Differences Main Effect for Gender by Race ANOVA (No noteworthy sex by race connections)

Slide 23

Scales p Clusters p Anxiety (ANX) .05 Internalizing Behaviors Whites > Blacks .05 Depression (DEP) .05 Externalizing Behaviors ns Anger (ANG) ns Aggression (AGG) ns Critical Behaviors .05 Bullying (BUL) ns Social Skills ns Conduct Problems (CP) ns Attention-Deficit (ADH) ns Competence ns Autistic Spectrum (AUT) ns Adaptive Behaviors ns Learning Disability (LD) ns Total (CBI) ns Mental Retardation (MR) ns Executive Function (EF) ns Gifted and Talented (GAT) ns Race/Ethnicity Differences* *Main impact for Race/ethnicity, without any communications Only INT uncovered contrasts on post hoc investigations because of traditionalist nature of Scheffe

Slide 24

Conclusions Minimal change in clinical and versatile practices because of essential demographic factors (aside from age in formative conditions - versatile conduct) CAB produces insignificant mean score contrasts as a consequence of essential demographic factors (sexual orientation, race/ethnicity) Behaviors surveyed by the CAB, both versatile and neurotic, give off an impression of being ordinarily circulated inside the more prominent populace. Taxi seems to create exceptionally dependable appraisal of the conduct of youth paying little heed to age, race, or sexual orientation

SPONSORS