Capital Budgeting Overview

1775 days ago, 691 views
PowerPoint PPT Presentation
2. . . BH Chapter 9 The Cost of Capital. Evaluating Caterpillar\'s Cost of CapitalAir Jordan\'s Divisional Cost of Capital. 3. Section 9 Learning Objectives. Portray the ideas hidden the firm\'s expense of capital (known as weighted normal expense of capital) and the reason for its calculation.Calculate the after-assessment expense of obligation, favored stock and basic equity.Calculate a firm\'s weighted

Presentation Transcript

Slide 1

´╗┐Capital Budgeting Overview Capital Budgeting is the arrangement of valuation systems for genuine resource speculation choices. Capital Budgeting Steps evaluating expected future money streams for the proposed genuine resource venture (BH Chap 11) assessing the association's cost of capital (BH Chap 9) in light of the association's ideal capital structure utilizing a basic leadership valuation method which relies on upon the organization's cost of cash-flow to choose whether to acknowledge or dismiss the proposed speculation (BH Chap 10)

Slide 2

BH Chapter 9 The Cost of Capital Estimating Caterpillar's Cost of Capital Air Jordan's Divisional Cost of Capital

Slide 3

Chapter 9 Learning Objectives Describe the ideas hidden the company's cost of capital (known as weighted normal cost of capital) and the reason for its count. Figure the after-duty cost of obligation, favored stock and normal value. Figure an association's weighted normal cost of capital. Modify the company's cost of capital on a by division or by venture premise. Utilize the cost of cash-flow to assess new venture openings.

Slide 4

Cost of Capital The company's cost of raising new subsidizes The weighted normal of the cost of individual sorts of subsidizing One conceivable choice govern is to contrast a venture's normal come back with the cost of the assets that would be utilized to fund the buy of the venture Accept if : venture's normal return > cost of capital

Slide 5

Cost of Capital Terms Capital Component = kind of financing, for example, obligation, favored stock, and regular value k d = cost of new obligation, before assessment k d (1-T) = after-duty segment cost of obligation k p = part cost of new favored stock k s = segment cost of held earnings(or inner value, same as r and E(R) utilized as a part of Chapters 5 and 7 of Megginson & Smart

Slide 6

More Cost of Capital Terms k e = segment supply of outside value raised through offering new basic stock WACC = w d k d (1-T) + w p k p + w c k s = the weighted normal cost ot capital which is the weighted normal of the individual segment expenses of capital w i = the portion of capital segment i utilized as a part of the company's capital structure

Slide 7

Component Cost of Debt Remember, a partnership can deduct their advantage cost for assessment purposes Therefore, the segment cost of obligation is the after-expense loan fee on new obligation k d (1-T) where T is the organization's minimal duty rate k d can be evaluated by finding the YTM on the organization's current securities

Slide 8

Cost of Debt Example We need to gauge the cost of obligation for Caterpillar which has a minor assessment rate of 35%. We locate the accompanying bond cite. CoName Rate Price Mat. Date Caterpillar 8.0 127.27 Feb 15, 2023 Annual coupon rate = 8%, n = 17 years , Price = 127.27% of standard esteem, Semiannual coupons Find YTM

Slide 9

Caterpillar's cost of obligation $1000 standard esteem, semi-yearly coupons

Slide 10

Cost of Preferred Stock, k ps Cost of new favored stock k p = D p/p D p = yearly favored stock profit p = cost per share from offer of favored stock Preferred Stock Characteristics Par Value, Annual Dividend Rate(% of Par) for the most part: no voting rights; must be paid profits before normal profits can be paid

Slide 11

Cost of Preferred Stock Example Caterpillar needs to offer new favored stock. The standard esteem will be $25 a share and Caterpillar chooses they will pay a yearly profit yield of 8.5%. Caterpillar's counsels say the stock will offer at a cost of $26 if the profit yield is 8.5%. What is the cost of this new favored stock?

Slide 12

Cost of Retained Earnings, k s 3 diverse methodologies can be utilized to assess the cost of held profit, however I detest the Bond Yield Plus Risk Premium Approach. Along these lines, overlook it. The 2 remaining methodologies expect that the organization's stock cost is in harmony.

Slide 13

The CAPM Approach to the Cost of Retained Earnings The CAPM Approach: is the required rate of come back from M&S Chapter 7. k s = k RF + (k M - k RF )b i Example: The hazard free rate is 4.4%, and the normal market return is 12%. What might Caterpillar's CAPM cost of held profit be if its beta is 1.15

Slide 14

Discounted Cash Flow Approach for the Cost of Retained Earnings The normal return recipe got from the consistent development stock valuation show. k s = D 1/P 0 + g = D 0 (1+g)/P 0 + g by and by: The intense part is evaluating g. Security experts' projections of g can be utilized. As indicated by the diary, Financial Management , these projections are a decent hotspot for development rate gauges.

Slide 15

DCF assess for the Cost of Retained Earnings for Caterpillar Recent Stock Price = $70.95, Last Dividend = $1.00, expected consistent development rate in profits = 11%

Slide 16

Difference in k s for Caterpillar between the two methodologies. CAPM assess for cost of RE: 13.1% DCF gauge for cost of RE: 12.6% Although I'm not angry with this slight distinction, why are they diverse? Our assessments. For CAPM, perhaps our market hazard premium is too high. Who thinks about our g gauge for Caterpillar. Other development rate gauges (incomes, profit, income, book esteem) may be utilized.

Slide 17

What to do about the distinctive cost of held profit gauges? CAPM: 13.1% DCF: 12.6% Average the two or pick either? Picking DCF appraise makes for a less demanding expense of new regular stock (outside value) gauge. Be that as it may, in the event that you needed to be moderate, run with the higher gauge. Forceful, run with lower evaluate Since there isn't much contrast, how about we run with the marginally higher CAPM of 13.1% for ks.

Slide 18

Adjusting for buoyancy expenses of new security issues. Incorporate buoyancy costs for assets raised for a venture as an extra starting expense of the venture. Then again alter the part cost of capital. For instance, for offering new regular & favored stock. k e = D 1/P 0 (1 - F) + g; k p = D/P 0 (1 - F) where F = flotation(underwriting) cost % P 0 (1 - F) is the net cost per share the organization really gets from offering new stock

Slide 19

Caterpillar's assessed cost of recently issued basic value , k e Let's backpedal to our unique DCF gauges: P 0 : $70.95, D 0 : $1.00, g = 11% Assume new stock can be sold at the present market cost and Caterpillar will acquire a 20% floatation cost for every share. k e = [$1.00(1.11)/$70.95(1-0.20)] + 11% = 13.0% DCF k s = 12.6%. Contrast = 0.4% So, in the event that you need to utilize the CAPM appraise for k s , then your k e gauge would be 13.1% +0.4% = 13.5%

Slide 20

Flotation costs Flotation costs rely on upon the danger of the firm and the sort of capital being raised. The buoyancy expenses are most elevated for normal value. Be that as it may, since most firms issue value occasionally, the per-extend cost is genuinely little. We will as often as possible overlook buoyancy costs while figuring the WACC.

Slide 21

Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC = w d k d (1-T) + w p k p + w ce k s w i = the division of capital segment i utilized as a part of the association's capital structure What is Caterpillar's WACC if their reasonable worth target capital structure is 25% obligation, 5% favored stock, and 70% basic value financing through held profit?

Slide 22

Caterpillar's Weighted Average Cost of Capital, WACC Recall our past appraisals for Caterpillar k d (1-T) = 3.6% , k p = 8.2% , k s = 13.1% w d = 25% or 0.25, w ps = 5% or 0.05, w c = 70% or 0.7

Slide 23

What components impact an organization's composite WACC? Economic situations. The company's capital structure and profit strategy. The association's speculation approach. Firms with less secure tasks by and large have a higher WACC.

Slide 24

Some Problems in evaluating Cost of Capital Small firms without profits: DCF approach is out. Firms that aren't traded on an open market: no beta information, CAPM approach is troublesome. Shouldn't something be said about deterioration? Huge wellspring of assets. Cost of deterioration assets = WACC with RE. WACC is only for normal hazard ventures.

Slide 25

Adjusting for venture hazard The WACC is for normal hazard ventures. An organization ought to modify their WACC upward for more hazardous ventures and descending for less dangerous undertakings = venture's Risk-Adjusted Cost of Capital. An organization can likewise make this conformity on a divisional premise too.

Slide 26

Estimating Project Risk Stand-alone hazard = measured by the inconstancy of the venture's normal returns. Corporate, or Within Firm, Risk = measured by the venture's effect on instability about the association's future income. Market, or Beta, Risk = measured by the venture's effect on the company's beta coefficient.

Slide 27

Using the CAPM for Risk-balanced Cost of Capital Can utilize this model to appraise a venture cost of capital, k P k P = k RF + (k M - k RF )b P where b P is the venture's beta Note: putting resources into undertakings that have pretty much beta (or market) hazard than normal will change the company's general beta and required return.

Slide 28

Risk and the Cost of Capital

Slide 29

Jordan Air Inc.: a Divisional Cost of Capital Example Jordan Air is a wearing merchandise clothing organization which has as of late stripped itself from the games establishment possession business. Jordan Air is beginning a golf hardware division to oblige its games attire division. The organization utilizes just obligation and regular value financing and supposes they ought to utilize distinctive cost of capital for every division.

Slide 30

Jordan Air Inc.: a Divisional Cost of Capital Example The organization has a 40% expense rate and uses the CAPM technique for assessing the cost of value. Clothing Division: 35% obligation and 65% value financing. Before-expense cost of obligation is 8%. Beta = 1.2. Golf Division: 40% obligation and 60% value financing. Before-expense cost of obligation 8.5%. Evaluated beta = to Callaway Golf's beta of 1.6.

Slide 31

Jordan Air's Apparel Division's Cost of Capital Calculation Th